|
List Info
Thread: Image color calibration
|
|
| Image color calibration |

|
2006-12-21 06:34:09 |
|
JR,
Thanks very much for the valuable insights!
The world of printing is new to me. I have much to learn. Any resources
(books or otherwise) that you might direct me to would me most
appreciated I'm sure others could benefit, too.
Regards,
George
--
[ p i x e l d a y ] wrote:
Gaijin" type="cite">
George Illes Signature
George,
First, if you are happy with
the prints, that's what counts.
However, please note that
although CostCo does calibrate their system every morning (but not at
every paper change as a good pro lab does -- or should do), CostCo
adjusts the colors of your file (in 99% of the time -- unless you know
the lab operator and ask to print "without adjustments" or "as is").
This means that it is highly possible that if you go back to CostCo and
get a different operator that has a different "taste" or "settings",
you will get a different color prints.
The high end pro labs (read:
costly in most cases) have a closed loop system that will not print
after a paper change (or startu-up) until the scanned output is within
a narrow acceptable tolerance.
If you'd like to truly see
your print "as is", I recommend trying www.mpix.com
and selecting the Kodak Endura Professional Paper (most CostCo print
on Fuji Crystal which is too high contrast IMNSHO and lose details in
the highlights and shadows) and the "without adjustment" option. This
will be "as good as it gets" in terms of accuracy possible within the
sRGB color space.
For even better results (if
it matters to you or your clients), you will need to find a lab that
prints in a wider color gamut -- this makes a tremendous difference in
the smoothness and accuracy of the tones. My lab take ProPhoto RGB
files. I've compared the same images submitted in sRGB and ProPhoto and
it's easy to tell which is which.
Again, if the prints are
great -- that's what counts.
Just my $0.02.
Regards,
JR G.
PS: My monitor is calibrated
(as is the rest of my workflow).
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, December 20, 2006 21:26
Subject:
[photoblogs-discuss] Re: Image color calibration
Thanks JR and Lynn and Pramesh and Joey and Tanja and Flatline and
Carmen!
I appreciate the feedback on the color calibration!
For what it's worth, I had a bunch of shots printed (at Costco, where
they calibrate their systems every morning) and the color looks just
like it does on my calibrated screen. Reds are red. Whites are white.
etc. So in the event the color looks off (i.e. orangy or yellowish) on
your screen it may be because your monitor is not calibrated, as
several of you noted.
Anyway, thanks again! Much appreciated!
George
Carmen Sisson wrote:
comcast.net" type="cite">Another
vote for orange, but I'll admit my monitor isn't calibrated.
Carmen
a.k.a. picturegrl or shadowseeker, depending on my mood
On Dec 18, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Tanja-Tiziana Burdi wrote:
Looks fine to me.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.0.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/594 - Release Date: 12/20/2006
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Photoblogs" group. To post to this group, send email to photoblogs googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to photoblogs-unsubscribe googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups-beta.google.com/group/photoblogs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|