List Info

Thread: Re: Critical remarks about onexposure.net




Re: Critical remarks about onexposure.net
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-06-07 07:44:29
Jajo, thanks for replying
 
I read the small print of onexposure carefully and decided not to join as I wasn't sure I would have full control of my photos.
 
Jens and other people maybe didn't and now probably wish they hadn't joined.
 
Why not just take down his photo's if thats what he wants...
 

jajo <m.crenshawgmail.com&gt; wrote:

Hi Francoise,

> So I was just curious, given the lack of quality in places on onexposure and the general high standard of your images (there's not a bad photo on your site, unlike onexposure!!), if there wasn't something personal in the decision to reject your photo...

I suggest you to drop this track and try another one. At this time,
Jens was one of our most valuable members and no sign of this quarrel
had been seen Rejecting his photo was not a fun thing to do,
especially since he has stated in the forums that he only uploads his
best work and all his previous uploads were really amazing. We
questioned our decision several times before taking it. And the
members came to the same conclusion without knowing who the
photographer of the photo was. I have a hard time to see how this
could have been personal in any way.

> Very true, we all run the risk of having our photo's nicked by someone dodgy, which makes it even worse when a so-called 'legitimate' site does it...

Do you seriously think this is a valid and fair comparison...? You
don't need to reply here, but do me a favor and think about it again.

/ Jacob



To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Photoblogs"; group.
To post to this group, send email to photoblogsgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to photoblogs-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/photoblogs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Re: Critical remarks about onexposure.net
country flaguser name
United States
2007-06-07 08:29:15
Hi Franciose,

I respect that you didn't join although I believe you would
never have
had any reason to leave if you joined.

>   Why not just take down his photo's if thats what he
wants...

That is what this thread is about - the responsibility of
both parties
while joining a photo community like Onexposure. I am not
going to
explain it again since everything has been written in the
thread
already. If the scenario was that we had stolen Jens photos,
didn't
give him any credit for them and still listed him as a
member of
Onexposure, I too would be really pissed off in his
situation. Now,
all we want to do is to keep the work of the community and
continue to
advertise his photos for free. His work is not being harmed
in any way
by being there. Onexposure has a high reputation, except for
any
damage that Jens has managed to do with these threads all
over the
internet.

I am going to contact Jens later with proposals on how to
solve this
in a friendly way that we both can accept. Until then, I
will respond
to any questions about Onexposure in this thread, except why
we don't
delete his photos because I believe it has already been
answered.

/ Jacob


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Photoblogs" group.
To post to this group, send email to photoblogsgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
photoblogs-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http:
//groups.google.com/group/photoblogs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )