Re: Hall of Fame

Hi Rob,

your doubts and your opinion about Hall of Fame, are mine
too.


Far to want to understand or to discover rules, parameters,
criteria
used to feed "Hall of Fame" but, lurking here and
there, I assumed
that if it should be "randomic"... Should be
perfect.


Fabrizio
------------------------
www.ikol22.com



On 14 Mag, 13:45, Robert Jones <robjones...yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I was very pleased to notice my old photoblog called
'Imitationeye' has recently got into the photoblogs hall of
fame.
>
> Imitationeye was only running for a couple of months
and I closed it down in February this year. So apologies to
the people who have clicked the link recently...(there are
even a couple of new bookmarks!!)
>
> Of course its a complement and I am grateful, but it
does leave me wondering about 'hall of fame'.
>
> What I mean is, shouldn't it be a bit more exclusive??
> I mostly agree with the first 10 or so nominations, but
after that the quality seems at bit ermm..variable??
> And there's still some brilliant photoblogs that aren't
yet included...eg Alkos, Shotage, Appareil etc...
> Surely photoblogs.org must be scraping the bottom of
the barrel if I'm in!
>
> All the best!
>
> Rob
>
>      
___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there
knows the answer. Try it
> now.http://uk.answers.yahoo.
com/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Photoblogs" group.
To post to this group, send email to photoblogsgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
photoblogs-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http:
//groups.google.com/group/photoblogs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---