<quote who="Sam Ruby">
> The definition of atom:updated indicates that the blog
post was updated
> in a way that the publisher considers significant, and
further goes on
> to state that not all modifications necessarily result
in a changed
> atom:updated value. [1]
>
> That being said, it may be the case that you want to
instruct Venus to
> ignore 'updated' values in a specific feed, or in all
feeds. Simply add
> the following to either the section for the specific
feed, or to the
> [planet] section if you want it to apply to all feeds:
>
> ignore_in_feed: updated
Won't that ignore it entirely? The behaviour Planet users
are accustomed to
(before Atom was widely deployed) is that when an upstream
entry is updated,
it is changed in the Planet feed but *not* bumped to the top
(in most cases
anyway; difficult to rely on RSS's implied behaviour at the
best of times).
This tends to be an important issue when dealing with
community Planets, so
perhaps - as much as I dislike adding or even proposing yet
more settings -
it should be a more explicit choice? I can understand that
when using Planet
as a personal feed reader, bumping updated entries to the
top is desireable.
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com
.au/
"I guess there's part of me that's always resented
it... to be an
actor, you have to have someone else say yes to
you." - Edward Norton
--
devel mailing list
devel lists.planetplanet.org
http://lists.planetplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
|