Neal Legler wrote:
> Thank you very much for your response! Those are some
great questions and
> leads, several of which we hadn't thought of.
You're welcome.
> The Python version is the same (2.4.3), Zope is
different (2.9.5 on Windows,
> 2.9.3 on Linux). Plone is different (2.5.1 Windows,
2.5.0 Linux).
Right, so I'd strongly recommend that now you've got it
working OK on
Windows, if you do still want it to work on Linux as well,
then get Zope
2.9.5 and Plone 2.5.1 on Linux too , to eliminate any issues
being due
to this version difference.
Originally you mentioned Plone 2.5RC2 but not your Zope
version. If you
had a later Zope originally (say 2.9.5) and then tried to
run it on
2.9.3, that could easily account for these problems.
> It was the machine itself. I am concerned this could
have had something to
> do with it. We reformatted the drive and rebuilt, but
could be using a
> data.fs file that is contaminated.
Since it was the box that was hacked not the Plone site
itself, I doubt
the data.fs is contaminated, especially if it works fine on
Windows.
Its possible some library somewhere on the machine is
accidentally older
after your rebuild. Could you have upgraded something, and
didn't keep a
record? (Which you've now lost through re-installing) Typing
"aptitude
install" or "yum install" - whatever Red
Hat's version is - takes less
time than documenting that you did it.
That would be hard to debug though now. Such a problem could
magically
disappear in a later release of Fedora that has later
packages.....
Regards,
Nick
--
Nick Davis
Web Application Developer
University of Leicester
http://www2.le.ac.uk
http://ebulletin.le.ac.uk
a>
_______________________________________________
Setup mailing list
Setup lists.plone.org
http://
lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
|