Nolan Garrett wrote:
> I've considered setting it up the following ways:
>
> Pound -> Squid -> Pound -> ZEO
> Apache -> Squid -> Pound -> ZEO
>
> Does this make any sense? I read about but have been
unable to find
> more detailed reference to the fact that caching can be
performed in
> zope, meaning I might be able to just use Pound ->
ZEO.
For best caching (=CacheFu) results, put squid in front of
zope. I'm not
sure if you can put pound inbetween, but that's because I
don't have
experience with pound yet. But in any case: you'll need
squid.
In my experience, it is handiest to put apache somewhere in
front of
that (again, not sure of the Pound location). Apache is
handy for
juggling the various IPs and domain names.
So: apache+squid+zope is the most well-known combination.
Put zope in a
zeo setup to allow more servers to share in the load. Pound
sounds like
the thing you'll need somewhere along the way, but I haven't
looked at
that myself yet.
Reinout
--
Reinout van Rees r.van.rees 
zestsoftware.nl
http://vanrees.org/weblog/
http://zestsoftware.nl/
"Military engineers build missiles. Civil engineers
build targets."
_______________________________________________
Setup mailing list
Setuplists.plone.org
http://
lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/setup
|