|
List Info
Thread: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5 patchset
|
|
| Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  Australia |
2007-06-05 01:25:08 |
All,
If you're not afraid to build the JDK from scratch without
using the
jdk15 port, please try the "current" JDK 1.5
patchset (see
http://www.eyesbeyond.com/freebsddom/java/jdk15.html).
This is based
on the 1.5.0 Update 11 JRL source rather than the 1.5.0 SCSL
source.
Unless I get some showstopper reports I plan to release this
as
patchset 5 within the next few days. Note that I don't
believe this
will fix the problems on -CURRENT/i386 some are seeing and
the raw
patchset itself will have problems if you don't have the
/usr/X11R6 symlink
(this shouldn't be the case for the updated jdk15 port
though).
I haven't yet completed the update for the jdk15 port, which
is why
you'll have to build it from scratch ;). I am working on an
update though,
so one will be available before the release of the
patchset.
I realise that Update 12 was just released, but I think its
worth getting
the newer patchset out now and switch to Update 12
afterwards rather than
stopping the release cycle at this point.
If the build is successful you should see something like
this:
> /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/java -version
java version "1.5.0_11-p5"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_11-p5-glewis_03_jun_2007_19_01)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
1.5.0_11-p5-glewis_03_jun_2007_19_01, mixed mode)
(Server VM being the default on amd64)
Thanks!
--
Greg Lewis Email : glewis eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
a>
Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis FreeBSD.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  United States |
2007-06-05 18:39:10 |
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:25 am, Greg Lewis wrote:
> All,
>
> If you're not afraid to build the JDK from scratch
without using
> the jdk15 port, please try the "current" JDK
1.5 patchset (see
>
http://www.eyesbeyond.com/freebsddom/java/jdk15.html).
This is
> based on the 1.5.0 Update 11 JRL source rather than the
1.5.0 SCSL
> source.
>
> Unless I get some showstopper reports I plan to release
this as
> patchset 5 within the next few days. Note that I don't
believe
> this will fix the problems on -CURRENT/i386 some are
seeing and the
> raw patchset itself will have problems if you don't
have the
> /usr/X11R6 symlink (this shouldn't be the case for the
updated
> jdk15 port though).
>
> I haven't yet completed the update for the jdk15 port,
which is why
> you'll have to build it from scratch ;). I am working
on an update
> though, so one will be available before the release of
the
> patchset.
>
> I realise that Update 12 was just released, but I think
its worth
> getting the newer patchset out now and switch to Update
12
> afterwards rather than stopping the release cycle at
this point.
>
> If the build is successful you should see something
like this:
> > /usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/java -version
>
> java version "1.5.0_11-p5"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
(build
> 1.5.0_11-p5-glewis_03_jun_2007_19_01) Java HotSpot(TM)
64-Bit
> Server VM (build 1.5.0_11-p5-glewis_03_jun_2007_19_01,
mixed mode)
>
> (Server VM being the default on amd64)
I have successfully built it and it seems working fine:
%java -version
java version "1.5.0_11-p5"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_11-p5-jkim_05_jun_2007_13_06)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
1.5.0_11-p5-jkim_05_jun_2007_13_06, mixed mode)
%sysctl kern.osreldate
kern.osreldate: 700043
I know -CURRENT is unsupported, so I used my patches from
ports/java/jdk15/files. I also had to disable plugin
support but
then I decided to make patches to pacify the errors
instead.
Keep in mind that plugin does/will *not* work on amd64, so
please
don't bother.
Thanks!
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  United States |
2007-06-05 18:56:19 |
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:39 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> I know -CURRENT is unsupported, so I used my patches
from
> ports/java/jdk15/files. I also had to disable plugin
support but
> then I decided to make patches to pacify the errors
instead.
> Keep in mind that plugin does/will *not* work on amd64,
so please
> don't bother.
Just in case, if anyone is interested in my patches, you can
find them
here:
http
://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-amd64_j2se
ht
tp://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-amd64_plugin
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  Australia |
2007-06-05 23:41:42 |
G'day Jung-uk,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:39:10PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim
wrote:
> I have successfully built it and it seems working
fine:
>
> %java -version
> java version "1.5.0_11-p5"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_11-p5-jkim_05_jun_2007_13_06)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
1.5.0_11-p5-jkim_05_jun_2007_13_06, mixed mode)
> %sysctl kern.osreldate
> kern.osreldate: 700043
Thanks!
> I know -CURRENT is unsupported, so I used my patches
from
> ports/java/jdk15/files. I also had to disable plugin
support but
> then I decided to make patches to pacify the errors
instead.
> Keep in mind that plugin does/will *not* work on amd64,
so please
> don't bother.
Well, I think "lower priority" is a better way to
put it than unsupported.
I'm certainly happy to have patches commited that fix it on
-CURRENT and
I didn't neglect these on purpose :(. That said, I think
the best thing
for the moment is to leave them in the port rather than try
and rush them
into the patchset, since they are FreeBSD specific and
pretty much everyone
on FreeBSD builds from the port.
But yes, for 1.5, the plugin will not work on amd64. The
port actually
disables building it even.
--
Greg Lewis Email : glewis eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
a>
Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis FreeBSD.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  Japan |
2007-06-06 01:21:36 |
Thank you! 'lower priority' sounds more comfortable than
unsupported.
I still see something wrong with file access on SMP kernel
while it works fineon uniprocess kernel. I created
jdk1.5.0-p4 on uniprocess kernel using linux-sun-jdk1.5.0
which runs fine, tomcat, jboss4 and eclipse. However, I
rebooted with SMP and ran the same jdk1.5.0-p4 all these
three did not start with messages like "cannot access
to XXX".
SMP kernel does not have any problem in buildworld even
with -j's, and it looks like jdk1.5.0 sees file system or
permissions differently....
I am using Opteron(dual-core) X 2 - i386 mode, xorg7.2 and
gnome2.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  Australia |
2007-06-06 09:38:47 |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:21:36PM +0900, Ken Yamada wrote:
> Thank you! 'lower priority' sounds more comfortable
than unsupported.
>
> I still see something wrong with file access on SMP
kernel while it works fineon uniprocess kernel. I created
jdk1.5.0-p4 on uniprocess kernel using linux-sun-jdk1.5.0
which runs fine, tomcat, jboss4 and eclipse. However, I
rebooted with SMP and ran the same jdk1.5.0-p4 all these
three did not start with messages like "cannot access
to XXX".
> SMP kernel does not have any problem in buildworld
even with -j's, and it looks like jdk1.5.0 sees file system
or permissions differently....
>
> I am using Opteron(dual-core) X 2 - i386 mode,
xorg7.2 and gnome2.
What file system are you using? UFS2 or ZFS?
--
Greg Lewis Email : glewis eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
a>
Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis FreeBSD.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  United States |
2007-06-06 12:46:31 |
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 10:38 am, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:21:36PM +0900, Ken Yamada
wrote:
> > Thank you! 'lower priority' sounds more
comfortable than
> > unsupported.
> >
> > I still see something wrong with file access on
SMP kernel
> > while it works fineon uniprocess kernel. I
created jdk1.5.0-p4
> > on uniprocess kernel using linux-sun-jdk1.5.0
which runs fine,
> > tomcat, jboss4 and eclipse. However, I rebooted
with SMP and ran
> > the same jdk1.5.0-p4 all these three did not start
with messages
> > like "cannot access to XXX". SMP kernel
does not have any problem
> > in buildworld even with -j's, and it looks like
jdk1.5.0 sees
> > file system or permissions differently....
> >
> > I am using Opteron(dual-core) X 2 - i386 mode,
xorg7.2 and
> > gnome2.
>
> What file system are you using? UFS2 or ZFS?
While you are at it, can you run the attached shell script
on the
build file system and see if it complains?
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  United States |
2007-06-06 15:52:55 |
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:25 am, Greg Lewis wrote:
> I realise that Update 12 was just released, but I think
its worth
> getting the newer patchset out now and switch to Update
12
> afterwards rather than stopping the release cycle at
this point.
I have built Update 12 with the same patchset + patches from
ports +
the attached additional patches:
%java -version
java version "1.5.0_12-p5"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43, mixed mode)
%sysctl kern.osreldate
kern.osreldate: 700043
Can we just skip Update 11?
Thanks,
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
|
|
| Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5
patchset |
  Australia |
2007-06-06 22:04:51 |
G'day Jung-uk,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:52:55PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim
wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:25 am, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > I realise that Update 12 was just released, but I
think its worth
> > getting the newer patchset out now and switch to
Update 12
> > afterwards rather than stopping the release cycle
at this point.
>
> I have built Update 12 with the same patchset + patches
from ports +
> the attached additional patches:
Thats great, I appreciate the work you're doing with the
Java port right
now .
> %java -version
> java version "1.5.0_12-p5"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43, mixed mode)
> %sysctl kern.osreldate
> kern.osreldate: 700043
>
> Can we just skip Update 11?
I think that the best course of action is to release the
patchset as it
currently is (I haven't heard of any showstoppers). I'll
commit the port
update immediately after that. Then lets wait for things to
settle for
a week and, assuming there haven't been any big problems, we
can commit
these patches to the port plus the necessary
Makefile/distinfo patches.
At the same time, Update 12 can be imported into the porting
repo and
OpenBSD and NetBSD people can give it a try too. Then in a
month or two
there will be a patchset 6 with official Update 12 support.
I don't want to stop the release cycle now and go through
all the import,
build/test on multiple OSes/architectures steps again. That
will not only
hold up a new 1.5 patchset it will also delay 1.6.0_01
patchset that is
ready to go (not to mention any OpenJDK work).
--
Greg Lewis Email : glewis eyesbeyond.com
Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com
a>
Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis FreeBSD.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-java freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-java-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
[1-9]
|
|