1. Excellent, we need OTR IMHO.
2. Plugins aren't ready yet.
3. I think (but don't pay take my word for it, I'm not a
dev) that OTR
would best be implemented as a plugin.
4. I think GPG is going to be moved off into a plugin,
someone correct
me if I'm wrong on that.
On 1/27/07, Timo Engel <timo-e freenet.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to extend psi with the Off-the-Record
Messaging (OTR) protocol. I know
> that not everybody wants to have OTR in Psi, because
it's not a xmpp extension
> and so on.
> However, i think it's important to have OTR and many
people would use it.
>
> Perhaps someone can give me a few references, how to do
it the best way.
> I saw that the version in the SVN has a plugin
interface. However, I was not
> able to get one of the plugins running. What is the
current state of the plugin
> interface? Or is it a better idea to built OTR directly
into psi, like it is
> done with GPG?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
> regards
>
> timo engel
>
> _______________________________________________
> psi-devel mailing list
> psi-devel lists.affinix.com
> http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com
>
--
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:hal jabber.rocks.cc
http://halr9000.com
_______________________________________________
psi-devel mailing list
psi-devel lists.affinix.com
http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com
|