We love you ejabberd!

Hehe. For the record, the goal of SoC is not about making
Psi better  
than coccinella (it's impossible anyway, Coccinella being
the  
greatest client in the world evah), it's about having
people do OSS  
development. I think Jinlge FT is a good example of this:
it's a  
feature that is not on a wishlist of any client, but is a
great  
project to do nevertheless. And, although not required, this
project  
even has aspects that are (indirectly) interesting to the
community.

Anyway, I think we can be quite happy with the SoC results.
Except  
for one, these are all contributors without any history of
Psi  
contrib, which i think is the goal of it altogether. And
it's good to  
hear that Psi is the most popular target for OSS Jabber
client  
development.

cheers,
Remko

Disclaimer: http
://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

_______________________________________________
psi-devel mailing list
psi-devellists.affinix.com
http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com

On 26 May 2006, at 07:42, Remko Troncon wrote:
> And it's good to
> hear that Psi is the most popular target for OSS Jabber
client
> development.

I think this may have more to do with the languages involved
than  
anything else; there's a lot of C++ knowledge in the world
but far  
far less erlang and TCL/Tk.

/K

-- 
Kevin Smith
Psi Jabber client developer/project leader (http://psi-im.org/)
Postgraduate Research Student, Computer Science, University
Of Exeter


_______________________________________________
psi-devel mailing list
psi-devellists.affinix.com
http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 26/05/2006, at 20:34 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:

> On 26 May 2006, at 07:42, Remko Troncon wrote:
>> And it's good to
>> hear that Psi is the most popular target for OSS
Jabber client
>> development.
>
> I think this may have more to do with the languages
involved than
> anything else; there's a lot of C++ knowledge in the
world but far
> far less erlang and TCL/Tk.

TCL/Tk is one of the many languages which was forced on us
in  
university, so it's not like people aren't learning it,
it's more  
that people are repulsed by it (the language, and the look
of any  
application which is crapped out of it. )

Erlang does need more exposure, though.

TX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEdx6AuMe8iwN+6nMRAugDAJ9ts3VngyL60HJNEJChscFecWEihACf
awCJ
ILWuMzbWaasbLmGty18NXr8=
=MYKZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
psi-devel mailing list
psi-devellists.affinix.com
http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com

On 5/26/06, Trejkaz <trejkaztrypticon.org> wrote:
> Erlang does need more exposure, though.

Wish they could lose a few {}'s in the syntax though.  I
read up on
erlang when I'd first heard of ejabberd.  The baked in
high-availability stuff is pretty compelling.


-- 
Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
im:haljabber.rocks.cc
http://halr9000.com
_______________________________________________
psi-devel mailing list
psi-devellists.affinix.com
http://lists.affinix.com/listinfo.cgi/psi-devel-affin
ix.com