Free blog application

Is there any FLOSS blog system using Pylons?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On 5/26/07, Jonas Melian <jonas.espgooglemail.com> wrote:
> Is there any FLOSS blog system using Pylons?

I've heard that blogs that use Pylons are more interesting
to read ;)

/me giggles

-jj

-- 
http://jjinux.blogspot.co
m/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

I have a few in development. If you want to help, or even
just tell me what
features you want, please let me know.

David

Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:

> 
> On 5/26/07, Jonas Melian
> <jonas.espgooglemail.com> wrote:
>> Is there any FLOSS blog system using Pylons?
> 
> I've heard that blogs that use Pylons are more
interesting to read ;)
> 
> /me giggles
> 
> -jj
> 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hi David,

I couldn't help you so far because I'm a newbie with Pylons
and
sincerely I'm thinking what platform to use for my future
developments, if TurboGears or Pylons. I like more Pylons by
its
integration (using WSGI) but the TurboGears' community is
greater and
there are already several free projects: http://www.turbogea
rs.org/cogbin/

And Gibe looks very promising.
http:/
/cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/gibe/0.10.12
You can see it's blog at http://nxsy.org/

Respect to features I would that wrere supported:
* Multi-user
* Atom/RSS feeds
* Trackbacks
* OpenID for users that want to comment (this would avoid to
use anti-
spam feauture)
* Anti-spam
* Plugin
* Theme
* Tags
* Multi-blog ? (but with a different data base for each
blog)


On 29 mayo, 07:27, Davinessto <davidsm...acm.org> wrote:
> I have a few in development. If you want to help, or
even just tell me what
> features you want, please let me know.
>
> David
>
> Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
>
> > On 5/26/07, Jonas Melian
> > <jonas....googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> Is there any FLOSS blog system using Pylons?
>
> > I've heard that blogs that use Pylons are more
interesting to read ;)
>
> > /me giggles
>
> > -jj


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hi David,

At the end I have decided to create a blog engine in
Pylons.
I begun to developing the models for Django but recently
released
Babel, a library for i18n and i10n that is very well
designed. Andi I
doubt much that Django added to its system (at least of fast
way).

My early election by Django was by its automatic admin
interface,
something very well for CMS projects, but I prefer more
flexibility.

I comment you the infrastructure that I would use in case we
could
collaborate:
* License: GNU GPL-2
* Pylons + SQLAlchemy + Elixir + Mako + Babel + Authkit

I would that all development went away commented in the
forum
(starting by the models), therefore people could contribute
quickly.

Greetings

On 29 mayo, 07:27, Davinessto <davidsm...acm.org> wrote:
> I have a few in development. If you want to help, or
even just tell me what
> features you want, please let me know.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Hi Jonas 

Jonas wrote:

> 
> Hi David,
> 
> At the end I have decided to create a blog engine in
Pylons.
> I begun to developing the models for Django but
recently released
> Babel, a library for i18n and i10n that is very well
designed. Andi I
> doubt much that Django added to its system (at least of
fast way).
> 

Yes, I seriously doubt the Django folks will consider babel,
and it is quite
a great library and the plan is to require it directly by
pylons.

> My early election by Django was by its automatic admin
interface,
> something very well for CMS projects, but I prefer more
flexibility.
> 
> I comment you the infrastructure that I would use in
case we could
> collaborate:
> * License: GNU GPL-2

Could you consider the LGPL or the MIT license? I believe a
good blog
application for Pylons would probably spread in a way that
follows the
logic described in the essay about why you might want to use
the LGPL.

> * Pylons + SQLAlchemy + Elixir + Mako + Babel +
Authkit

Can't go wrong here ;) Consider Xapian for site-search.

> I would that all development went away commented in the
forum
> (starting by the models), therefore people could
contribute quickly.

I don't quite understand what you mean.

Let's use this thread to do some planning. I believe the
majority of the
work required will be in the administration interface and
the second most
amount of work will be in javascript. How much do you value
the
administration interface?

Looking forward to your response,
David


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On 26 jun, 01:38, Davinessto <davidsm...acm.org> wrote:
> Jonas wrote:
>
> > I comment you the infrastructure that I would use
in case we could
> > collaborate:
> > * License: GNU GPL-2
>
> Could you consider the LGPL or the MIT license? I
believe a good blog
> application for Pylons would probably spread in a way
that follows the
> logic described in the essay about why you might want
to use the LGPL.
I'm sorry but the license will be GNU GPL. You can read
about this
decision in this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/blogt
or/browse_thread/thread/f7910c0f83d099d6

> > * Pylons + SQLAlchemy + Elixir + Mako + Babel +
Authkit
>
> Can't go wrong here ;) Consider Xapian for
site-search.
You can read on this forum_ about technologies to been used.
And for
site-search I had been looking and Xapian was one of my
options too.
It looks better than PyLucene and lets searchs in MySQL /
PostgreSQL /
FireBird.

.. _forum: http://groups.
google.com/group/blogtor

> Let's use this thread to do some planning. I believe
the majority of the
> work required will be in the administration interface
and the second most
> amount of work will be in javascript. How much do you
value the
> administration interface?
Better in the forum of above because already has been
started threads
about this.

I have already started to do some planning with Qiangning
Hong but if
he agrees in that another person could collaborate and *you
agree with
the license* then there is no problem. I think that would be
well only
a core team of 2 or 3 persons as developers.

You have reason about the administration interface, and I
give much
value to that, well... to all in general. I'm any
perfectionist with
the work, I like the things well done, and I like get the
maximum
result possible.

Greetings!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On 6/27/07, Jonas <jonas.espgooglemail.com> wrote:
> I have already started to do some planning with
Qiangning Hong but if
> he agrees in that another person could collaborate and
*you agree with
> the license* then there is no problem. I think that
would be well only
> a core team of 2 or 3 persons as developers.

Collaboration is always a good thing   Welcome,
David!

-- 
Qiangning Hong
http://www.douba
n.com/people/hongqn/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

The project about blog engine has been called AroundWord_.
And we
changed the group name to:

ht
tp://groups.google.com/group/aroundword-discuss/

.. _AroundWord: http://www.AroundWord.org/



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discussgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at h
ttp://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---