List Info

Thread: accepted peps that should be final?




accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 14:16:06
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be
marked final:

 SA  358  The "bytes" Object                      
    Schemenauer, GvR
 SA 3106  Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() 
GvR
 SA 3109  Raising Exceptions in Python 3000           
Winter
 SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python 3000          
Winter
 SA 3111  Simple input built-in in Python 3000        
Roberge
 SA 3112  Bytes literals in Python 3000               
Orendorff

n
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

Re: accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 14:19:34
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitzgmail.com> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should
be marked final:
>
>  SA  358  The "bytes" Object                 
         Schemenauer, GvR
>  SA 3106  Revamping dict.keys(), .values() &
.items()  GvR

Not yet -- the implementations of these two are incomplete.

>  SA 3109  Raising Exceptions in Python 3000           
Winter
>  SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python 3000          
Winter

I believe Collin is still working on a patch.

>  SA 3111  Simple input built-in in Python 3000        
Roberge

Final.

>  SA 3112  Bytes literals in Python 3000               
Orendorff

Let's keep this open since it is still a subject of debate,
e.g. some
folks feel that b"..." should be immutable.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~
guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

Re: accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 14:22:14
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitzgmail.com> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should
be marked final:
>
>  SA 3109  Raising Exceptions in Python 3000           
Winter

Not yet implemented, will be this weekend.

>  SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python 3000          
Winter

This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this).
Has a
decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both
"," and "as" in
except statements?

Collin Winter
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

Re: accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 14:28:35
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <collinwgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python 3000      
    Winter
>
> This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect
this). Has a
> decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both
"," and "as" in
> except statements?

I think 'except as' should go into 2.6.  I haven't heard any
reason
not to make this change.  It should be easy to implement.

n
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

Re: accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 15:12:55
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitzgmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <collinwgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 
         Winter
> >
> > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to
reflect this). Has a
> > decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support
both "," and "as" in
> > except statements?
>
> I think 'except as' should go into 2.6.  I haven't
heard any reason
> not to make this change.  It should be easy to
implement.

Just the syntax, right, or should the end-of-suite cleanup
code be
backported, too?

Collin Winter
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

Re: accepted peps that should be final?
user name
2007-05-18 15:18:13
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <collinwgmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitzgmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <collinwgmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  SA 3110  Catching Exceptions in Python
3000           Winter
> > >
> > > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to
reflect this). Has a
> > > decision been made as to whether 2.6 will
support both "," and "as" in
> > > except statements?
> >
> > I think 'except as' should go into 2.6.  I haven't
heard any reason
> > not to make this change.  It should be easy to
implement.
>
> Just the syntax, right, or should the end-of-suite
cleanup code be
> backported, too?

Yes, just the syntax.  That will make it similar to loop
comprehension
leaking the var in 2.6, but not 3.0.

n
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

[1-6]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )