List Info

Thread: RFC 4721 on Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (Revised)




RFC 4721 on Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (Revised)
user name
2007-01-31 20:17:40
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC
libraries.

        
        RFC 4721

        Title:      Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response
Extensions (Revised) 
        Author:     C. Perkins, P. Calhoun,
                    J. Bharatia
        Status:     Standards Track
        Date:       January 2007
        Mailbox:    charles.perkinsnokia.com, 
                    pcalhouncisco.com, 
                    jayshreenortel.com
        Pages:      26
        Characters: 60386
        

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-05.txt

        URL:        http://www.
rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4721.txt

Mobile IP, as originally specified, defines an
authentication
extension (the Mobile-Foreign Authentication extension) by
which a
mobile node can authenticate itself to a foreign agent.
Unfortunately, that extension does not provide the foreign
agent any
direct guarantee that the protocol is protected from replays
and
does not allow for the use of existing techniques (such as
Challenge
Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP)) for
authenticating portable computer devices.

In this specification, we define extensions for the Mobile
IP Agent
Advertisements and the Registration Request that allow a
foreign
agent to use a challenge/response mechanism to authenticate
the
mobile node.

Furthermore, this document updates RFC 3344 by including a
new
authentication extension called the Mobile-Authentication,
Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) Authentication
extension.  This new extension is provided so that a mobile
node can
supply credentials for authorization, using commonly
available AAA
infrastructure elements.  This authorization-enabling
extension MAY
co-exist in the same Registration Request with
authentication
extensions defined for Mobile IP Registration by RFC 3344. 
This
document obsoletes RFC 3012.  [STANDARDS TRACK]

This document is a product of the Mobility for IPv4
Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet
standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion
and 
suggestions for improvements.Please refer to the current
edition of the 
Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the
standardization 
state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this
memo is 
unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST
list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF
distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUESTIETF.ORG.  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list
should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUESTRFC-EDITOR.ORG.

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained
by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-infoRFC-EDITOR.ORG with the
message body 

help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:

        To: rfc-infoRFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to
either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-ManagerRFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are
for
unlimited distribution.

Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITORRFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223,
Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-distmailman.rfc-editor.org
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )