Igor Jagec wrote:
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>>> BTW about the www.rpm.org project of making
upstream provider of rpm,
>>> will you participating in it? I mean, do you
have any plans of merging
>>> your work into it? Or you will continue with
your own work? Thanks.
>> I very specifically was not asked to participate in
www.rpm.org
>> (Matthias did
>> hope that I would participate, that's not the same
as asking).
>
> They explicitly don't want you to participate, or they
just didn't
> invite you to participate? What the heck all these
people have against
> you?
A sore subject...
Honestly? From my pov, ego/personality conflicts mostly.
:(
Obviously Jeff isn't in this to win a popularity contest,
but imo, his
experience/prowess should speak for itself, granting a fair
amount of
latitude for sassy-ness.
> As I can see, you've resolved tons of bugs and what
they have done
> in the meantime is almost nothing. I can't understand
why they don't
> appreciate your work.
+1 (that's a perception anyway). I too (with Matthias)
would like Jeff
to participate as well. fwiw, when rpm.org/upstream all
went down, I
expressed the opinion that Jeff *should* be asked to
participate, since
it is/would-be unfortunate to have the one person on the
planet with the
most rpm-mojo not involved.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
Rpm-devel mailing list
Rpm-devel lists.dulug.duke.edu
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-devel
a>
|