RE: Syntax for adding build element digests to spec files?

> > Any ideas?
> 
> Something that would work for GPG signatures as well
would be nice. 
> 
> Anyway, some thoughts:
> 
> Source0(md5=3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f):
foo.tar.bz2
> 
> Source0: MD5(foo.tar.bz2) ==
3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f
> 
> Source0: foo.tar.bz2,
md5(3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f)
> 
> I kinda like choice #1 myself.
> 
Me too, +1...james

_______________________________________________
Rpm-devel mailing list
Rpm-devellists.dulug.duke.edu
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-devel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpm-devel-bounceslists.dulug.duke.edu
[mailto:rpm-devel-
> bounceslists.dulug.duke.edu] On Behalf Of Oden, James
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:14 PM
> To: RPM internals development and distro coordination
> Subject: RE: [Rpm-devel] Syntax for adding build
element digests to
spec
> files?
> 
> 
> 
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > Something that would work for GPG signatures as
well would be nice.

> >
> > Anyway, some thoughts:
> >
> > Source0(md5=3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f):
foo.tar.bz2
> >
> > Source0: MD5(foo.tar.bz2) ==
3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f
> >
> > Source0: foo.tar.bz2,
md5(3c07bfe0794635d96996d4a07ad4ec9f)
> >
> > I kinda like choice #1 myself.
> >
> Me too, +1...james
>

I like this for another reason, and that is that you can
introduce much
more generic syntax:

    <TAG_NAME> (<kv1>, ... ,<kvN>):
<value>

Where <kv#> is a key value pair that is taken to be an
attribute.

Just my 2 cents...james
 
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-devel mailing list
> Rpm-devellists.dulug.duke.edu
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-devel
_______________________________________________
Rpm-devel mailing list
Rpm-devellists.dulug.duke.edu
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/rpm-devel