List Info

Thread: Re: Re: device mapper not reporting no-barrier-support?




Re: Re: device mapper not reporting no-barrier-support?
user name
2008-02-25 19:36:56
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke
<anders.henke1und1.de> wrote:
> > I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD,
as I'm using Kernel
> > 2.6.24.2 with DRBD 8.2.5 on top of an LVM2 device
(LV).
> > -LVM2/device mapper doesn't support write
barriers

That's right.

> > -DRBD uses blkdev_issue_flush() to flush its
metadata to disk.

Which won't work if device-mapper is underneath.

> >  On a no-barrier-device, DRBD should receive
EOPNOTSUPP, but
> >  it really does receive an EIO. Promptly, DRBD
gives the
> >  error message "drbd0: local disk flush
failed with status -5".
> > I've posted a lengty summary of my findings to
> > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user
/2008-February/008665.html
> > ... that DRBD does catch the EOPNOTSUPP for
blkdev_issue_flush and
> > BIO_RW_BARRIER, but the lvm implementation of
blkdev_issue_flush in
> > 2.6.24.2 aparently does return EIO for
blkdev_issue_flush.
> I'd say it's a DM bug.

The dm code is unchanged, but look at the limited endio
handling in
ll_rw_blk.c:

static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int err)
{
        if (err)
                clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE,
&bio->bi_flags);

        complete(bio->bi_private);
}

int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t
*error_sector)
{
...
        wait_for_completion(&wait);
        if (error_sector)
                *error_sector = bio->bi_sector;
        ret = 0;
        if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
                ret = -EIO;

Alasdair
-- 
agkredhat.com

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-develredhat.com
http
s://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Re: Re: device mapper not reporting no-barrier-support?
country flaguser name
Denmark
2008-02-26 10:17:42
On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke
<anders.henke1und1.de> wrote:
> > > I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and
DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
> > > 2.6.24.2 with DRBD 8.2.5 on top of an LVM2
device (LV).
> > > -LVM2/device mapper doesn't support write
barriers
> 
> That's right.
> 
> > > -DRBD uses blkdev_issue_flush() to flush its
metadata to disk.
> 
> Which won't work if device-mapper is underneath.
> 
> > >  On a no-barrier-device, DRBD should receive
EOPNOTSUPP, but
> > >  it really does receive an EIO. Promptly,
DRBD gives the
> > >  error message "drbd0: local disk flush
failed with status -5".
> > > I've posted a lengty summary of my findings
to
> > > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user
/2008-February/008665.html
> > > ... that DRBD does catch the EOPNOTSUPP for
blkdev_issue_flush and
> > > BIO_RW_BARRIER, but the lvm implementation of
blkdev_issue_flush in
> > > 2.6.24.2 aparently does return EIO for
blkdev_issue_flush.
> > I'd say it's a DM bug.
> 
> The dm code is unchanged, but look at the limited endio
handling in
> ll_rw_blk.c:
> 
> static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int
err)
> {
>         if (err)
>                 clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE,
&bio->bi_flags);
> 
>         complete(bio->bi_private);
> }
> 
> int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *bdev,
sector_t *error_sector)
> {
> ...
>         wait_for_completion(&wait);
>         if (error_sector)
>                 *error_sector = bio->bi_sector;
>         ret = 0;
>         if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
>                 ret = -EIO;

You are right, the return value got broken there. Does this
make it
return -EOPNOTSUPP properly for you?

diff --git a/block/blk-barrier.c b/block/blk-barrier.c
index 6901eed..55c5f1f 100644
--- a/block/blk-barrier.c
+++ b/block/blk-barrier.c
 -259,8
+259,11  int blk_do_ordered(struct request_queue *q, struct
request **rqp)
 
 static void bio_end_empty_barrier(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 {
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+			set_bit(BIO_EOPNOTSUPP, &bio->bi_flags);
 		clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
+	}
 
 	complete(bio->bi_private);
 }
 -309,7
+312,9  int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *bdev,
sector_t *error_sector)
 		*error_sector = bio->bi_sector;
 
 	ret = 0;
-	if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
+	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_EOPNOTSUPP))
+		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	else if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_UPTODATE))
 		ret = -EIO;
 
 	bio_put(bio);

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-develredhat.com
http
s://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )