el5.2 - ATH5K

Hi,
are there any plans to add ath5k to the el5.2 kernel. I have
been 
playing with the daily builds on FC8 and even though the
code is not yet 
ready, it appears to be more stable than the madwifi
driver.
This would certainly be a good and welcome addition to 5.2.

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
rhelv5-beta-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list

Grant Williamson wrote:
> Hi,
> are there any plans to add ath5k to the el5.2 kernel. I
have been 
> playing with the daily builds on FC8 and even though
the code is not yet 
> ready, it appears to be more stable than the madwifi
driver.

That hasn't been my impression; as one who has several
systems running 
madwifi I'd welcome something built in, if it worked.


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaacoco.merseine.nu  Z1aaaaaaacoco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoo
t.com/advice/email.top.php
ht
tp://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support
.microsoft.com/kb/555375

Please do not reply off-list

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
rhelv5-beta-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list

John,
    well I agree arh5k is far from ready, however as a
frustrated 
madwifi end user, I welcome this new driver, which already
(to me 
atleast) shows great promise.

John Summerfield wrote:
> Grant Williamson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> are there any plans to add ath5k to the el5.2
kernel. I have been 
>> playing with the daily builds on FC8 and even
though the code is not 
>> yet ready, it appears to be more stable than the
madwifi driver.
>
> That hasn't been my impression; as one who has several
systems running 
> madwifi I'd welcome something built in, if it worked.
>
>

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
rhelv5-beta-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list