To: Rejuvenation
From: Ellis
Comments by Ellis on "Intervention for sarcopenia for
muscle weakness in older persons." by SE Borst.
>PMID: 15385272 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
>VA Medical Center, GRECC-182, 1601 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL
32608-1197, USA. seborst%40ufl.edu">seborst
ufl.edu
>OBJECTIVE: three major strategies have been tested for combating the
losses in muscle mass and strength that accompany ageing.
>Those strategies are testosterone replacement for men,
growth hormone replacement and resistance exercise
training.
[Unfortunately, they are missing the reason why there
is loss of muscle mass... atrophy of the muscle. And
why does the muscle atrophy?
Aha! - Ellis]
>This review will cover the risks and benefits associated with each of
these interventions.
>METHODS: searches of PubMed and Web of Science through May 2004
yielded 85 relevant citations for the following descriptors:
sarcopenia, aging/ageing, elderly, testosterone, hormone replacement,
growth hormone, resistance training, exercise, muscle mass, nutrition
and strength.
[Again, they are not addressing the very reason why there
is loss of muscle mass: atrophy of the muscle. - Ellis]
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: testosterone replacement in elderly
hypogonadal men produces only modest increases in muscle mass and
strength, which are observed in some studies and not in others.
[Testosterone replacement cannot regrow muscle that
has atrophied. Once it is lost, it is lost. Atrophy
of the muscles can be PREVENTED, but it cannot be
REPAIRED. - Ellis]
Higher doses have not been given for fear of accelerating prostate
cancer.
[A bad reason, but it wouldn't work anyways... you
cannot regenerate the muscle that has atrophied...
you can only PREVENT the muscle from atrophy. - Ellis]
Growth hormone replacement in elderly subjects produces a high
incidence of side-effects
[Question to SE Borst: At what dose do you find "a high incidence
of side effects" and what were those side effects? - Ellis]
>does not increase strength
>and does not augment strength gains resulting from resistance training.
[Of course it cannot augment strength AFTER muscle has
atrophied... It can only augment strength, and it does
augment strength, in men who have NOT YET lost muscles...
- Ellis]
>Some alternate strategies for stimulating the growth
hormone/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway continue
to hold promise. The latter include growth hormone releasing
hormone (GHRH) and the complex of IGF-I with its major
circulating binding protein (IGF-I/IGFBP-3).
[It won't work. Guaranteed. - Ellis]
Resistance training remains the most effective intervention for
increasing muscle mass and strength in older people.
[It won't work, either. Older people will lose muscles
until DOCTORS finally figure out why the muscle atrophies,
which they haven't figured out yet.
I seem to be saying the same things over again, for many
years. You must PREVENT the loss of muscle mass, and you
can only do it with a program such as mine... - Ellis]
Elderly people have reduced food intake and increased
protein requirements. As a result, adequate nutrition is
sometimes a barrier to obtaining full benefits from
resistance training in this population.
[Adequate nutrition is NEVER a barrier for obtaining
full benefits from resistance training in any population...
the problem is to define : what is "Adequate nutrition" ?
Adequate nutrition must start LONG BEFORE muscles
atrophy.
The problem is that they are trying to CURE sarcopenia,
when there cannot be a cure for it... there can only
be prevention. - Ellis]
.