Btw,
Even though Mongrel seems to work quite nicely behind the
Apache, we
still need to cleanup the mongrel adapter implementation.
Any help
appreciated. Perhaps Zed could have a look at this?
-g.
On 10/5/06, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope,
>
> frankly I am quite happy to use Apache. I think for the
last 4 years
> or so, I have been tooooo experimental. Some times
standard solutions
> are good for you
>
> regards,
> George
>
> PS: of coz anyone can try nitro with any frontend
server suit
yourself!
>
>
>
> On 10/5/06, Alexander Lazic <al-nitrogen none.at> wrote:
> > On Don 05.10.2006 11:37, George Moschovitis wrote:
> > >
> > >as I described in an earlier email, I was
experiencing some strange
> > >slowdowns when i was running a mongrel cluster
behind a lighttpd
> > >proxy. Today I experimented a bit with Apache
2.2 + nod_proxy_balancer
> > >as a proxy solution. And voila, my application
runs just great
> > >
> > >Interestingly, the mongrel home page, also
declares apache the prefer
> > >ed deployment option and mentions problems
when running behind
> > >Lighttpd.
> >
> > Just for my curiosity:
> >
> > Have you thought to use nginx ( http://www.nginx.net/ )?!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Alex
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nitro-general mailing list
> > Nitro-general rubyforge.org
> > h
ttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.gmosx.com
> http://www.nitroproject.o
rg
>
--
http://www.gmosx.com
http://www.nitroproject.o
rg
_______________________________________________
Nitro-general mailing list
Nitro-general rubyforge.org
h
ttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
|