Dear devs,
I am trying to create a simple digest mail to represent the
latest
activity of the forum to this list. At the end of this email
you can
find the current format, I would like to hearmore
suggestions.
-g.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply nitroproject.org <noreplynitroproject.org>
Date: Mar 19, 2007 3:46 PM
Subject: [NP.ORG] Nitro/Og Fora daily diggest
To: george.moschovitisgmail.com
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 13:13:37 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/33
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/39
Hello,
the article you quote is not that negative about UUIDS.
<blockquote>However, seeing what George said about
single class
Comment for articles and whatever, appears to be
interesting.</blockquote>
at last, someone finds this interesting idea erhm...
interesting 
-g.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 12:52:40 UTC 2007
Subject: Forum improvements.
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/38
Here are the latest forum improvements:
- no captcha for verified users (at the moment just me and
judson).
Judson can you please verify this?
- uploads from windows should work (antoniolo can you verify
this?)
- the topic hierarchy is kept, a thread view will be
available in the
next update.
- initial work on forum digest.
keep the suggestions and bug reports coming,
-g.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 09:53:02 UTC 2007
Subject: Ruby meta programming problem
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/37
I am using the following code to generate some utility
methods:
<code><
class User::Proxy
attr_accessor :oid
attr_accessor :name
attr_accessor :level
for key, val in User::LEVEL_VALUES
define_method("#?") do
level >= key
end
end
</code>
My problem is that this doesn't work correctly. It seems
that level
referes to a value at the time of the method generation and
not the
actual object value at run time. Any idea how to fix this?
-g.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:35:33 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/3
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/36
thanks again.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:34:07 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/35
I am not a big fan of test-first development. I always
finalize my
design *after* I write some code. So writing tests
beforehand, seems
like a waste of time. When the design is finalized it is the
right
time to do tests.
-g.
>From judson.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 08:09:45 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/3
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/34
This is some more fixes for the specs. Specifically, and
importantly,
the class definitions for the fixture classes have been
moved into the
setup clauses for the contexts - the upshot of which is that
they're
isolated from one another.
>From antoni0.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 00:31:21 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/4
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/33
i read all the above articles and also this one:
http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/archives
/2005/07/22/uuid-vs-sequences/
Based on above article, my opinion goes together with
Judson. As far
as i could see, that type of id schema will be overkill for
og at the
moment.
However, seeing what George said about single class Comment
for
articles and whatever, appears to be interesting.
looking forward to see where this topic goes to!
>From judson.myopenid.com
Date: Mon Mar 19 00:07:43 UTC 2007
Subject: RE: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/32
<blockquote>I understand that, but I thought it would
be a nice way of
someone else to verify my changes.</blockquote>
My shorter response (long one eaten by captchas) is that the
specs are
a better indication of what you mean than the code is. I'd
rather fix
code to make specs pass than vice versa.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 16:54:17 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/31
Thanks antonio,
I will check your patch and integrate it if everything is ok
-g.
>From antoni0.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 14:58:32 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/30
Hello folks! now np.org is amazing! 
There are 4 patches in this file.
Today morning i pulled the latest version from repo and I've
added a
new patch also. This one is a 'revision' for modelmixin
renaming.
Take a special care on many_to_many_rich_associations. This
one is
neither a new patch or code-revision, it's a bug fix.
George, please
run the tests to see what i'm talking about.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 10:41:25 UTC 2007
Subject: Minor np.org update
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/29
I just added some minor fixes to this site:
- improved topic list view
- you can use a subset of html
- you can use the blockquote to quote earlier posts
- you can use the code tag to markup source code (under
construction,
I will add syntax highlighting support and some fixes)
- I fixed the stupid 'page-jump' css bug. Many thanks to the
CSS
master George Paparakis (http://www.qupy.com/) for
his help.
keep the suggestions and bug reports coming...
regards,
George.
PS: Also added links to oxywtf.de and the repository to the
homepage.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 08:15:18 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/4
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/28
Btw,
Tom emailed me this interesting link:
http://codesnipers.com/?
q=node/143&title=Using-UUID/GUID-as-Primary-Key-in-R
ails
I kind of like the aproach.
-g.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 08:10:27 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/4
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/27
I could see it as an option for the Manager.
Making it mandatory would make upgrades problematic as
well.
I will implement this as an option. I am still investigating
the best
way to tackle this problem.
-g.
>From gmosx.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 08:09:10 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/26
but it's probably better to keep specs in line with the
code, you know?
I understand that, but I thought it would be a nice way of
someone
else to verify my changes.
-g.
>From judson.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 03:44:58 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http://
www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/4
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/25
I could see it as an option for the Manager. Making it
mandatory
would make upgrades problematic as well.
Regarding the old thread: the best solution still seems to
me to be
PostgreSQL style sequences. In RDMSes that don't provide
sequences,
it seems like they could be emulated with autoincrementing
tables.
>From judson.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 03:35:13 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/24
No really: here they are.
Another quick note: I've started moving some of the contexts
from
store into other spec files - since they really relate to
relations
and models, I put them in those spec files.
>From judson.myopenid.com
Date: Sun Mar 18 03:31:13 UTC 2007
Subject: RE:
In-Reply-To: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/18
Message-ID: http:/
/www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/23
Here's fixes against the new API stuff.
There are 8 specs still failing. All of them were failing
before, I think.
I've started adopting RSpec's new UI on "should"
clauses - instead of
should_thing they look like "should thing." So
specs might require
rspec 0.8
--
This mail is automatically generated from the http://nitroproject.org/
fora
digest robot. It presents the discussions in the fora during
the last 24 hours.
Do not reply to this email.
--
http://blog.gmosx.com
http://cull.gr
http://www.joy.gr
http://nitroproject.org
_______________________________________________
Nitro-general mailing list
Nitro-generalrubyforge.org
h
ttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
|