Nitro/Og Fora daily diggest

>From jonathan-buch.de 
Date: Fri Mar 30 09:37:20 UTC 2007
Subject: RE: 
In-Reply-To: http://www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/a6
fxwU3DSr27NzeJeZaaqU
Message-ID: http://www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/bb
Pq1I3Qir25J4eJeZaaqU

I'm not sure, do we want to depend on another library?

>From rmela.myopenid.com 
Date: Fri Mar 30 21:17:08 UTC 2007
Subject: RE: 
In-Reply-To: http://www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/a6
fxwU3DSr27NzeJeZaaqU
Message-ID: http://www.nitroproject.org/fora/posts/view/ae
Hcg43Wqr25J4eJeZaaqU

I don't know whether or not you want to.   But whether you
want to or not, you do.

I think at this point there are three options:

*replace XML Simple with existing standard library XML
functionality
*keep XML simple, which entails adding the dependency to the
gem
*do nothing -- require xmlsimple, and keep the gemspec
without the dependency statement

The third option in my opinion is an error -- raw will
install without complaint, but will throw an exception at
runtime. The dependency is a fact whether it's expressed or
not.

So options 1 or 2 -- either remove the dependency or, if
not, then express it in the gemspec.





--
This mail is automatically generated from the http://nitroproject.org/
fora
digest robot. It presents the discussions in the fora during
the last 24 hours.
Do not reply to this email.
_______________________________________________
Nitro-general mailing list
Nitro-generalrubyforge.org
h
ttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general