On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> For those of you who don't know, RubySpec is a
MediaWiki-based attempt of mine
> to get community members to work together building a
Ruby specification. I
> figure this is the only real way we're going to get to
a complete spec, and it
> would additionally provide a comprehensive online
reference for the language
> itself.
>
> Ruby-Doc does a great job of documenting what the Ruby
developers have been
> able to document, but it doesn't comprise a spec.
Specifically, deeper details
[...]
There is some effort, possibly more than one, to revive
rubicon as a
comprehensive test suite, "proving" the assertions
made in the specification
and documentation. Is there some way of tying these two
together,
at least so that the spec refers to the tests?
Another thing, off topic for this I suppose, but
while dreaming do
What would it take to get Rdoc refactored in such
a way that it uses less memory? I've tried to build
ruby on old machines, and succeeded, only to have the
`gmake install-doc` run out of swap. Is this something
that someone familiar with google's summer of code
could
get going, or is that too ambitious? As we add more
docs
this problem will increase.
end
Hugh
|
