There should be no tweaking to get it working correctly
(ruleflows don't
even use separate threads during execution currently).
Based on your
explanation however, it is not obvious why things might be
going wrong. I
suggest trying to use the audit view or a custom logger to
figure out what
is going on in both cases. If you are losing records, there
must be some
reason why the rules are not being executed for those
records (e.g. the
record does not match the conditions of the rule, the
ruleflow-group is
deactivated before all records have been processed, etc.).
Try making a
small use case where you enter a number of records and not
all records seem
to be processed. Then try looking at the audit log to see
which rules are
activated and deactivated, which ruleflow-groups are
activated and
deactivated, etc. If you do find a problem where you thing
the ruleflow is
not behaving as expected, it would be nice if you could send
me a
self-countained example that shows the problem and I'll try
to look into it
asap.
One additional piece of advice: it does seem a little
strange however that
you are using 50 ruleflow-groups for 116 rules.
Ruleflow-groups are used to
specify the order in which large rule sets should be
executed. If you want
to specify the order for single rules, other features like
salience, agenda
groups, etc. might also be useful. But nevertheless,
ruleflows should even
work in these circumstances.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mazrim" <UE011434 guest.telecomitalia.it>
To: <rules-userslists.jboss.org>
Subject: [rules-users] ruleflow trouble when process a large
number of
records
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using drools 4.0.4 on jboss 4.0.5.
> I build a ruleflow and a set of rules following the
documentation on
> official drools site.
> The ruleflow consist of about 50 ruleflow-group and 116
rules.
> The ruleflow works correctly when processing a little
number of records
> (100-1000).
> Instead if the number of records is around 20000 (they
are processed in
> sets
> of 100 record) many rules don't fire; so many records
are lost in output.
> If I process in sets of 50 records I lose less records
than in sets of 100
> records. And If I process in sets of 20 records I lose
less records than
> in
> sets of 50 records.
> Must I tweak the JVM memory or the number of JVM
threads? Or does this
> issue
> concern the building of ruleflow (maybe it's bad
built)?
>
> Thanks in advance
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www
.nabble.com/ruleflow-trouble-when-process-a-large-number-of-
records-tp16960999p16960999.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-userslists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-userslists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
|
