Re: findertools.launch reports "no eligible process"

Ronald Oussoren wrote:

> IIRC at least one of the ae* modules seems to have
assumptions on  
> the byteorder engrained into its design.  Fixing that
may well be  
> possible but there doesn't seem to be anyone around
that both wants  
> to have these modules fixed and has enough time (or
money) to  
> actually get this done.

Not just that - there's other modernisation work required
too. All of  
which would be a complete waste of time and effort since
nobody uses  
these modules any more.

Anyway, the items to remove from plat-mac are:

aepack
aetools
aetypes
findertools
gensuitemodule
lib_scriptpackages
MiniAEFrame

You can also remove OSATerminology from lib-dynload - it's
only used  
by gensuitemodule and will have to go sooner or later
anyway.

has
-- 
http://appscript.sou
rceforge.net
http://rb-appscript
.rubyforge.org

http://appscript.sourceforge.net/objc-appscript.html

_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIGpython.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

On 12-jun-2007, at 16:07, has wrote:

> Not just that - there's other modernisation work
required too. All of
> which would be a complete waste of time and effort
since nobody uses
> these modules any more.
>
> Anyway, the items to remove from plat-mac are:
>
> aepack
> aetools
> aetypes
> findertools
> gensuitemodule
> lib_scriptpackages
> MiniAEFrame

You missed EasyDialogs, which is also the one we may want to
keep. It  
uses aepack for the file dialogs.
--
Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansencwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution
-- Emma  
Goldman


_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIGpython.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig