Yes, sorry I've missed that method.
Thanks
Emil Ivov wrote:
> Hello Damencho,
>
> Well here's my thinking: When a
CALL_PARTICIPANT_REMOVED event gets
> fired it implies that a call participant is no longer
in the source
> call, so it is logical for a call participant to not be
among the
> participants of a call once this event gets fired. The
getCall method
> of the call participant itself should also return null
since the
> participant does not belong to the call any more and it
should not
> advertise a non-existent relationship.
>
> The CallParticipantEvent that's dispatched upon removal
of a
> participant, however, has a getSourceCall() method.
Wouldn't that do
> the trick?
>
> Emil
>
> Damian Minkov wrote:
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> yesterday I've committed the call history
implementation and tests,
>> but I broke the cc build.
>> The reason Is in method
CallSipImpl.removeCallParticipant :
>>
>> callParticipant.setCall(null);
>>
>> Is there any particular reason for this? I'm
waiting for the event of
>> removed participant and I'm expecting
>> that he has a sourceCall but its null.
>>
>> damencho
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe sip-communicator.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help sip-communicator.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe sip-communicator.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help sip-communicator.dev.java.net
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe sip-communicator.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help sip-communicator.dev.java.net
|