|
List Info
Thread: Re: SIP Presence problem
|
|
| Re: SIP Presence problem |
|
2008-02-06 04:40:58 |
|
HI DAMIAN, I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN AND IT SEEMS THAT THE CONDITION IN THE CODE USED TO NOT CONSIDER THE DOCUMENT WHEN MANY PERSON ELEMENTS ARE PRESENT SHOULD NOT BE THERE. YOU CAN REMOVE IT IF YOU WANT, I'LL DO IT ASAP OTHERWISE. THANKS FOR REPORTING THIS !
CHEERS,
BEN
----- MESSAGE D'ORIGINE ---- DE : DAMIAN MINKOV <DAMENC HO DAMENCHO.COM>
À : DEVSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
ENVOYé LE : MARDI, 5 FéVRIER 2008, 20H11MN 29S
OBJET&NBSP;: RE: [SIP-COMM-DEV] RE: SIP PRESENCE PROBLEM
HI,
YES
YOU
ARE
RIGHT
ABOUT
THE
TUPLES,
MY
FAULT.
BUT
WHAT
I
AT
FIRST
WANT
TO
ASK
WAS
FOR
THE
PERSON
ELEMENT.
I'VE
SEARCHED
AND
SAW
IN
RFC
THAT
THERE
CAN
BE
MORE
THAN
ONE
PERSON
IN
SUCH
MESSAGE,
BUT
WE
ARE
IGNORING
THE
MESSAGE
IF
THERE
IS
SUCH
OCCASION.
WHAT
DO
YOU
THINK
?
DAMENCHO
BENOIT
PRADELLE
WROTE:
>
HI
DAMIAN,
>
>
I
DON'T
REALLY
UNDERSTAND
YOUR
PROBLEM.
AS
FAR
AS
I
UNDERSTAND,
YOU
>
THINK
THAT
WHEN
THERE
ARE
MANY
'TUPLE'
ELEMENTS
IN
THE
DOCUMENT,
WE
>
AREN'T
PARSING
IT
?
IF
IT'S
WHAT
YOU
WANT
TO
SAY,
I
THINK
THAT
YOU'RE
>
WRONG,
EVERY
TUPLE
ELEMENT
IS
PARSED
IN
THE
CURRENT
SIMPLE
>
IMPLEMENTATION.
>
IF
THERE
ARE
MANY
STATUSES
FOR
THE
SAME
CONTACT,
THE
FINAL
STATUS
WILL
>
BE
THE
STATUS
WITH
THE
LOWEST
PRIORITY
AS
THE
RFC
RECOMMENDS
TO
HANDLE
>
THE
STATUSES
IN
ORDER
OF
PRIORITY.
>
>
IF
I
DIDN'T
UNDERSTAND
YOU,
CAN
YOU
PRECISE
THE
PROBLEM
?
>
>
CHEERS,
>
BEN
>
>
DAMIAN
MINKOV
A
éCRIT
:
>>;
HI
AGAIN,
>>
>>
ACTUALLY
WE
MUST
CONTINUE
DISPATCHING
XML
NO
MATTER
HOW
MUCH
PERSONS
>>
ARE
THERE,
>>
BUT
THEN
THERE
ARE
MULTIPLE
TUPLE
ELEMENTS
AND
I'M
WONDERING
WHICH
>>
ONE
SHOULD
WE
CHOOSE
>>
AS
ONE
OF
THEM
IS
THE
LAST
ONE
>>
>>;
DAMENCHO
>>
>>
DAMIAN
MINKOV
WROTE:
>>>
HI
BEN,
>>>
>>>
I'VE
NOTICED
A
PROBLEM
WITH
SIP
PRESENCE
,
>>;>
IN
SOME
SITUATIONS
WHEN
USING
OPENSER
IN
THE
PIDF
XML
THERE
IS
MORE
>>>
THAN
ONE
PERSON
>>>
AND
I
SAW
IN
THE
CODE
THAT
THE
METHOD
PARSING
THE
PIDF
XML
RETURNS
>>>
IN
SUCH
SITUATIONS
AND
SO
>>>
THE
CONTACT
ALWAYS
STAYS
OFFLINE
AS
NO
STATUS
IS
DISPATCHED.
>>>
I
DON'T
KNOW
IF
THERE
IS
SOME
PRIORITY
IN
THE
PERSONS
LIST,
BUT
WHAT
>>>
YOU
THINK
>;>>
IS
IT
OK
TO
SELECT
THE
FIRST
PERSON
AND
GET
ITS
STATUS
?
>>;>
>>>
DAMENCHO
>>>;
>>>
>>;
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
TO
UNSUBSCRIBE,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTO EV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
>>
FOR
ADDITIONAL
COMMANDS,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTOEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
>>
>;>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
TO
UNSUBSCRIBE,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTOEV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
>
FOR
ADDITIONAL
COMMANDS,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTOEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TO
UNSUBSCRIBE,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTOEV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-UNSUBSCRIBESIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
FOR
ADDITIONAL
COMMANDS,
E-MAIL:
SIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET" HREF="MAILTOEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET">DEV-HELPSIP-COMMUNICATOR.DEV.JAVA.NET
NE GARDEZ PLUS QU'UNE SEULE ADRESSE MAIL ! COPIEZ VOS MAILS VERS YAHOO! MAIL |
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|