discussion Digest, Vol 14, Issue 1

Send discussion mailing list submissions to
	discussionsipforum.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to
	discussion-requestsipforum.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	discussion-ownersipforum.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. SIP to CPIM (Raj krishna)
   2. Implementation of Softswitch (nagaraju gadhiraju)
   3. second INVITE after 407 error (Deepak Shenoy)
   4. Re: second INVITE after 407 error (Somesh S Shanbhag)
   5. Re: second INVITE after 407 error (Deepak Shenoy)

------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:06:36 +0530
From: "Raj krishna" <raj.rk.krishnaoracle.com>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] SIP to CPIM
To: <discussionsipforum.org>
Message-ID: <036001c6b606$6536b160$c4974598idc.oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi all,

   I am working on SIP to CPIM and CPIM to sip. i found on
the same as draft0 i.e.
draft-ietf-simple-cpim-mapping-01.txt.
can anybody tell me what is latest draft or rfc on it.

Regards,
Raj krishna
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20060802/53bdf2b3/attachment
-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:32:01 +0530
From: "nagaraju gadhiraju" <gnraju2002gmail.com>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Implementation of Softswitch
To: discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID:
	<3767b2120608020902oaf6b272j95002d2934614afcmail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
    I am trying to implement a VOIP softswitch ,using oSIP 
and  oRTP ,I
would be very thankful if anybody can help me in the
interface of oSIP and
oRTP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20060802/14eb11db/attachment
-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:32:41 -0400
From: "Deepak Shenoy" <dshenoysoundbite.com>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] second INVITE after 407 error
To: <discussionsipforum.org>
Message-ID:
	<9303A9A4755F584187871678E54487B604D0868Asbmail.soundbite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

Has anybody experienced the following problem?

My UA is sending an INVITE to another UA with SDP info using
the public
proxy iptel.org.

The first INVITE gets a 407 error from the proxy .so my UA
resends the
INVITE but this time without the SDP info. So the other side
has no clue

How to set up the RTP media stream.

My UA is using Radvision stack .Has anybody seen this kind
of a problem
before.

Thanks

Deepak

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20060802/d5bdae5b/attachment
-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: image002.gif
Url : http://sipforum.org/pi
permail/discussion/attachments/20060802/d5bdae5b/attachment-
0001.gif 

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Somesh S Shanbhag <someshssyahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] second INVITE after 407
error
To: Deepak Shenoy <dshenoysoundbite.com>,
discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID: <20060802215140.91384.qmailweb61112.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Deepak,

  I think this is valid. The other side MUST include the SDP
offer in  final successful response (preferably 200 OK) and
UAC MUST include  answer in ACK which follows the response.

  Regards,
  Somesh S. Shanbhag

Deepak Shenoy <dshenoysoundbite.com> wrote:   
                  p.MsoNormal   {margin-left:48.0pt;}       
                  Hi,

    Has anybody  experienced the following problem?

    My UA is sending  an INVITE to another UA with SDP info
using the public proxy iptel.org.

    The first INVITE  gets a 407 error from the proxy .so my
UA resends the INVITE but this time  without the SDP info.
So the other side has no clue
    How to set up the  RTP media stream.

    My UA is using  Radvision stack .Has anybody seen this
kind of a problem before.

    Thanks

    Deepak

    _______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussionsipforum.org
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-----------------------------------------
SIMPLICITY IS THE BEAUTY.
BE NATURAL LIVE NATURAL.
-----------------------------------------
Somesh S. Shanbhag
Focus Area - VoIP Team (FA-VoIP)
Mascon Global Limited
#59/2, 100Ft Ring Road
Banashankari II stage
Bangalore-560070
Karnataka
INDIA
Website: http://www.mgl.com/
-----------------------------------------

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail
Beta.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20060802/390329b6/attachment
-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://sipforum.org/pi
permail/discussion/attachments/20060802/390329b6/attachment-
0001.gif 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:13:46 -0400
From: "Deepak Shenoy" <dshenoysoundbite.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] second INVITE after 407
error
To: <someshssyahoo.com>, <discussionsipforum.org>
Message-ID:
	<9303A9A4755F584187871678E54487B604D0872Fsbmail.soundbite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Somesh,

Thanks for your quick response.

Not sure I understand. Are you saying it is valid for the
UAC not to
include SDP info in the retry INVITE after receiving a 407
response from
the proxy? 

Thanks

Deepak

________________________________

From: Somesh S Shanbhag [mailto:someshssyahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:52 PM
To: Deepak Shenoy; discussionsipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] second INVITE after 407
error

Hi Deepak,

I think this is valid. The other side MUST include the SDP
offer in
final successful response (preferably 200 OK) and UAC MUST
include
answer in ACK which follows the response.

Regards,
Somesh S. Shanbhag

Deepak Shenoy <dshenoysoundbite.com> wrote:

Hi,