List Info

Thread: discussion Digest, Vol 29, Issue 29




discussion Digest, Vol 29, Issue 29
country flaguser name
United States
2007-12-12 10:20:42
Send discussion mailing list submissions to
	discussionsipforum.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to
	discussion-requestsipforum.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	discussion-ownersipforum.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Is "fmtp" line needed in 200 OK answer?
(Andrea Puddu)
   2. Tutorials on SIP (and other protocols) over	at
      Techtionary.com (Dan York)
   3. Re: Prefered audio codec (Jeff Wright)


------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:38:15 +0000
From: Andrea Puddu <androjokerhotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Is "fmtp" line
needed in 200 OK
	answer?
To: Herve Jourdain <herve.jourdainmstarsemi.com>,
"'Donald Lee'"
	<baolovebaogmail.com>
Cc: discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID: <BLU124-W30CB97029A614DEC2C41BFC0650phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Thanks for your analysis.

By chance, I've just found a parameter on the phone that can
help me  -> "Full SDP Answer" .... I've
switched it to OFF.
Now the phone sends only one codec in the 200 OK response
(g729), but without the "fmtp" line.
So the phone starts talking in G729 but AS (or SBC) sends a
BYE to the phone!!!!!

I'm starting to think that SBC does not like the lack of
"fmtp" filed in the response .....

Andrea



From: herve.jourdainmstarsemi.com
To: androjokerhotmail.com; baolovebaogmail.com
CC: discussionsipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Is "fmtp" line
needed in 200 OK answer?
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:25:55 +0100





















Hi,

 

As far as I remember of
RFC 3264, the devices should be prepared to receive ANY of
the codecs it sends
in its offer/response?

So basically, if you
respond with 3 codecs, you should be able to receive at any
time on any of
those 3 codecs, and switch between them?

That?s why it seems
customary on several phones to answer with only one codec?

 

But even if it?s
stated this way in the specs, I still do think that before
switching to another
codec, the UAs should at least use the codec that was agreed
for in the negotiation
at first (the ?highest priority? one, in your case G729).

Experience shows,
unfortunately, that even if it?s usually the case, it?s NOT
ALWAYS
the case?

I think you might have an
example here, and I know I?ve met several devices ? phones
or
gateways usually ? that would also behave in this way?

 

So maybe try with only 1
codec in the response, to see if it works better?

 

But if you do so, please
switch to outband DTMF (RFC 2833 or RFC 4733), because once
you give only G729
in the answer there should not be any possibility to switch
to G711 for in-band
DTMF.

And your SDP suggests
outband DTMF is not activated.

 

Regards,

 

Herve

 









From:
discussion-bouncessipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bouncessipforum.org] On Behalf Of
Andrea Puddu

Sent: mercredi 12 d?cembre 2007
09:35

To: Donald Lee

Cc: discussionsipforum.org

Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion]
Is "fmtp" line needed in 200 OK answer?



 

I agree with your analysis. I've noticed that for example
Cisco and Linksys phone sends only one codec in the 200 OK
SDP envelope.



But... Can the sending of multiple codec in the 200 OK
response be an issue?

I cannot complain with phone provider about this behaviour.




Anyway why does the phone talk with G729 and AS talk with
G711?  I'm
wondering if the AS performs a check on  fmtp field in the
200 OK response
.................





Thanks,



Andrea 













Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:24:05
+0800

From: baolovebaogmail.com

To: androjokerhotmail.com

Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Is "fmtp" line
needed in 200 OK
answer?

CC: discussionsipforum.org



# the "g" and "G" have no difference.
and the offer indicate that it's not G729B codec.





# I don't think the lack of fmtp in answer is the reason
for issue. Maybe the ip phone should reply only one codec in
its SDP. Maybe the
multi codec in answer make the offer confused.



 





On 12/11/07, Andrea Puddu <androjokerhotmail.com> wrote: 



Hello guys,



I'm facing an issue when a mobile (common mobile 3G phone)
tries to call an
internal SIP phone through its geographical number.

The issue is that when the SBC sends the INVITE to the IP
phone,  in the
SDP  enclosure it  suggests these codecs: 



m=audio 19570 RTP/AVP 18 8 0

a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000

a=fmtp:18 annexb=no

a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000

a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000



The 200 OK of the phone (SDP part only) is:



m=audio 57956 RTP/AVP 18 8 0

a=rtpmap:18 g729/8000

a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000

a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000

a=sendrecv



So the IP phone start to talk with G729 and SBC replies with
G711A!!! So I
can't hear the voice coming from mobile phone!!!!



I have two questions:



- Can the difference between the offer (G729) and the answer
(g729) be
significant? I mean the difference because the "g"
is not capital in
the answer

- Can the lack of the "fmtp" line in the answer
cause troubles? 





Thanks 1000,



Andrea







 

 







Prenditi una pausa e sfida i tuoi amici a Ladybird su
Messenger! Messenger Giochi





_______________________________________________

This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list

TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org








-- 

BR

Donald 

 







Per questo Natale fai i tuoi auguri con Messenger! Windows
Live Messenger







____________________________________________________________
_____
Scarica GRATIS la versione personalizzata MSN di Internet
Explorer 7!
ht
tp://optimizedie7.msn.com/default.aspx?mkt=it-it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20071212/25d230ce/attachment
-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:05:18 -0500
From: Dan York <dyorkvoxeo.com>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Tutorials on SIP (and other
protocols)
	over	at Techtionary.com
To: discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID: <475FDC8E.4010303voxeo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

As there have been a lot of questions on this list lately
asking about
basic aspects of SIP, I thought I'd just mention a resource
that's out
there.  Tom Cross has assembled a whole bunch of Flash-based
tutorials
at http://www.techtionary.co
m/ on a wide range of tutorials.
Unfortunately, since his site is based on Flash, I can't
give you a URL
to go directly to the SIP-related tutorials, but if you go
to
techtionary.com and click on "S", you can then
scroll down to the
various SIP-related tutorials.  In many of them he has
provided
graphical illustrations of the call flow for various aspects
of SIP.  He
also has tutorials on SRTP and a wide range of other
non-VoIP-related
protocols.

Regards,
Dan

P.S. I have no affiliation with Techtionary.com and cannot
vouch for the
accuracy or anything else about the site.  I just know of
Tom and the
site and thought it might be of use for some folks looking
to learn
about SIP.

-- 
Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication
Technology
Office of the CTO    Voxeo Corporation     dyorkvoxeo.com
Phone: +1-407-455-5859  Skype: danyork  http://www.voxeo.com
Blogs: http://blogs.voxeo.com  http://www.disrupt
ivetelephony.com

Bring your web applications to the phone.
Find out how at http://evolution.voxeo.com




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:19:35 -0500
From: "Jeff Wright" <JWrightazteknetworks.net>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Prefered audio codec
To: "Fredrik Sandedal" <fredrik.sandedalenera.se>,
	<discussionsipforum.org>
Message-ID:
	<ABFF960C9FAE494482BD527AB5D6263F0820EF8CMI8NYCMAIL03.Mi8.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

My experience in the past has shown that G.729a will do a
better job
than most LBRCs (low bit rate codecs) of passing DTMF digits
(and tones
in general).  It certainly is a lot better than G.723.1. 
But don't bet
the bank on it.  Make sure you have "wide" digits
(i.e. at least 100ms
duration both on and off) from the phone device.

 

Is there any reason you have to pass the digits through the
voice path?
Why not use some digit relay protocol like RFC4733?

 

Jeffrey D. Wright

System Test Engineering Manager

Aztek Networks, Inc.

(303) 415 6149

jwrightazteknetworks.net

 

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bouncessipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bouncessipforum.org] On Behalf Of
Fredrik Sandedal
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:50 AM
To: discussionsipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Prefered audio codec

 

Hi,

 

Could someone give me suggestions on the best audio codec to
use when
DTMF is necessary and the bandwidth must be kept on a low
rate?

 

I heard that there could be problems with DTMF and
G729AnnexA but I
haven't been able to do any advanced test with this.

 

Regards,

 

Fredrik Sandedal, Enera

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/piperm
ail/discussion/attachments/20071212/99b3e38f/attachment.html
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 73 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
Url : http://sipforum.org/piperma
il/discussion/attachments/20071212/99b3e38f/attachment.gif 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org


End of discussion Digest, Vol 29, Issue 29
******************************************

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )