Send discussion mailing list submissions to
discussion sipforum.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to
discussion-requestsipforum.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discussion-ownersipforum.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Identity New Subject RFC 4474 (dwardithinktest.com)
2. Re: Identity New Subject RFC 4474 (Robert Sparks)
------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:39:29 -0800
From: <dwardithinktest.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Identity New Subject
RFC 4474
To: "'Robert Sparks'" <rjsparksnostrum.com>
Cc: discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID: <200801042039.m04Kdcc1024305sipforum.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Hi Robert ?C Sorry, I??m new to the alias. I guess this
subject was
discussed in the past. However, I??m inquiring to see how
many companies
are actually implementing it in practice for we are thinking
of implementing
this feature into our test toolsets. Is there any interest?
~ dw
_____
From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjsparksnostrum.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:48 AM
To: dwardithinktest.com
Cc: 'monica'; discussionsipforum.org
Subject: Identity (was Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some
parameters in
Record-Route header)
Identity?
Yeah - there's been testing at SIPit.
Was that a subject change? Or did I miss the tie-in with
earlier question?
For complete subject changes, please do touch the Subject:
line to reflect
it.
RjS
On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:18 PM, <dwardithinktest.com> wrote:
Has anyone implemented RFC 4474? ~ Dennis
_____
From: discussion-bouncessipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bouncessipforum.org] On Behalf Of
Robert Sparks
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:00 PM
To: monica
Cc: discussionsipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some parameters in
Record-Route header
Nope. I don't believe they're standardized.
That said, the spec is clear on what to do with parameters
you don't
recognize. You leave them alone.
You keep them in the URIs you put into Routes based on
Record-Route. For
everything but ;lr and the
transport-related parameters defined in 3261, these
parameters are only some
element talking to itself.
They don't change the behavior of any other element in the
network, and it's
required to give the thing
that put the record-route header value there exactly what it
asked for back
in the Route header.
RjS
On Jan 3, 2008, at 7:57 PM, monica wrote:
Hi All,
I find a sip package which Record-Route header is like:
Record-Route:<sip:139.24.125.12;lr;pm;n2>
I don't know what's the meaning of the parameters 'pm' and
'n2'. Does
somebody know these 2 parameters?
Thanks.
Regards,
monica
_____
?????????????????????? <http://get.live.cn>
??????????
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.
org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.
org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20080104/c06c2192/attachment
-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:48:26 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparksnostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Identity New Subject
RFC 4474
To: <dwardithinktest.com>
Cc: discussionsipforum.org
Message-ID: <A15A681B-5210-417C-ADD5-C021A22FA867nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"
I think you'll find what you want by searching for
"Identity" on this
page:
https://www.sip
it.net/SIPit20_Summary
RjS
On Jan 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, <dwardithinktest.com>
<dwardithinktest.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert ?C Sorry, I??m new to the alias. I guess
this subject was
> discussed in the past. However, I??m inquiring to see
how many
> companies are actually implementing it in practice for
we are
> thinking of implementing this feature into our test
toolsets. Is
> there any interest? ~ dw
>
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjsparksnostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:48 AM
> To: dwardithinktest.com
> Cc: 'monica'; discussionsipforum.org
> Subject: Identity (was Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some
parameters in
> Record-Route header)
>
> Identity?
>
> Yeah - there's been testing at SIPit.
>
> Was that a subject change? Or did I miss the tie-in
with earlier
> question?
> For complete subject changes, please do touch the
Subject: line to
> reflect it.
>
> RjS
>
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:18 PM, <dwardithinktest.com> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone implemented RFC 4474? ~ Dennis
>
> From: discussion-bouncessipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-
> bouncessipforum.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:00 PM
> To: monica
> Cc: discussionsipforum.org
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some parameters in
Record-Route
> header
>
> Nope. I don't believe they're standardized.
>
> That said, the spec is clear on what to do with
parameters you
> don't recognize. You leave them alone.
> You keep them in the URIs you put into Routes based on
Record-
> Route. For everything but ;lr and the
> transport-related parameters defined in 3261, these
parameters are
> only some element talking to itself.
> They don't change the behavior of any other element in
the network,
> and it's required to give the thing
> that put the record-route header value there exactly
what it asked
> for back in the Route header.
>
> RjS
>
> On Jan 3, 2008, at 7:57 PM, monica wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I find a sip package which Record-Route header is
like:
> Record-Route:<sip:139.24.125.12;lr;pm;n2>
>
> I don't know what's the meaning of the parameters 'pm'
and 'n2'.
> Does somebody know these 2 parameters?
> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> monica
>
>
> ?????????????????????? ??????????
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please
visit http://
> sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please
visit http://
> sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/piperm
ail/discussion/attachments/20080104/29fa1e00/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussionsipforum.org
End of discussion Digest, Vol 30, Issue 15
******************************************
|
