Send discussion mailing list submissions to
discussion sipforum.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to
discussion-request sipforum.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discussion-owner sipforum.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Sip] What's the difference between session and
dialog in
SIP? (Shah Newaz)
2. Re: 185 ringing / 199 trying (Raj)
------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:44:07 +1100
From: Shah Newaz <newaz live.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] [Sip] What's the
difference between
session and dialog in SIP?
To: Raj <rajasekhar.l gmail.com>, gaurav
katiyar
<gaurav_katiyar yahoo.com>
Cc: sip ietf.org, discussion sipforum.org, ??????
<szj087 gmail.com>,
bmwg ietf.org, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg alcatel-lucent.com>
Message-ID: <BAY107-W2239EAD9AB36AF00381A9AC4DC0 phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
hi can u help to develop the SIp client software using
Visual C#.
thank u
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:45:48 +0530From: rajasekhar.l gmail.comTo: gaurav_katiyar yahoo.comCC: discussion sipforum.org; szj087 gmail.com; sip ietf.org;
vkg alcatel-lucent.com; bmwg ietf.orgSubject: Re:
[SIPForum-discussion] [Sip] What's the difference between
session and dialog in SIP?Do u mean, Dialog is at signaling
level, session is at media transport level.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:44 PM, gaurav katiyar
<gaurav_katiyar yahoo.com> wrote:
Sip "Session Initiation Protocol". It talks about
media session, i mean how to initiate, modify and terminate
a session and Dialog provides a sort of context (like
caller, callee, location, routing etc.) to modify this
session. So dialog is more related to route the sip message
to right node and body (SDP) handles media session if
present. Dialogs may have media sessions Or may not.
Take an example of B2BUA. It is a type of statefull proxy
having two dialog and one media session if doing media
routing.
Donald Lee <baolovebao gmail.com> wrote:
old good questions in sip, also add another
"transaction".
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:18 AM, ??????? ? <szj087 gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, VijayThanks very much for your timely answers.From this
specification, session is a combination of signaling
planeand media plane messages and processes that enable two
or moreparticipants to communicate. I think session is a
larger scope thandialog. In another word, one session can
contain more than one dialog.Is what I understand
right?Zongjun2008/4/24, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg alcatel-lucent.com>:
> There is some work progressing in the BMWG WG to create
performance> metrics around SIP. One of the first tasks
in such an endeavor> is to define the notion of dialogs
and sessions. Please see> Section 3.1.1 of> https
://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/bmwg-sip-benc
h-term/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-term-00.txt> of the above
draft for some insight.>
> ???????????? wrote:>> > Hi, Lincoln>
>> > thanks for your instructions.> >>
> I know that dialog can exist without session since
SUBSCRIBE/REFER can> > create dialog and without any
media between communication peers.> >> > What I
want to know is the relationship of dialog and session
when> > they both exist in one communication activity.
Take a example, when> > there are 2 person
participating talks with voice, we say there is a> >
dialog and a session.> >> > But when one caller
invites another callee and gets five 200 final> >
responses from 5 UA every of which has its own session
description. We> > can say that there are 5 dialogs
between caller and the other 5> > callees, right? And
then what is the exact number of session in this> >
scenario? One session or five session? That is what I want
to know.> >> > Dialog is determined by dialogID
(call-id, from/to tag) and session id> > is determined
by session id given in the SDP message. My answer is>
> there are 5 dialog a!
nd one session now, right?> >>> - vijay>
--> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories,
Alcatel-Lucent> 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle,
Illinois 60532 (USA)> Email: vkg {alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}> WWW:
http://www.alcatel-
lucent.com/bell-labs>____________________________________
___________Sip mailing list https:/
/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipThis list is for NEW
development of the core SIP ProtocolUse sip-implementors cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sipUse
sipping ietf.org for new developments on the application of
sip-- BRDonald
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing listTO UNSUBSCRIBE,
or edit your delivery options, please visit h
ttp://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussionPost to
the list at discussion sipforum.org
Gaurav Katiyar
Induslogic india pvt. ltd
B-34/1 sector 59 NOIDA
Phone:9818381368
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!
Mobile. Try it
now._______________________________________________This is
the SIP Forum discussion mailing listTO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit
your delivery options, please visit h
ttp://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussionPost to
the list at discussion sipforum.org-- -Raaz
____________________________________________________________
_____
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger?
http://imagine-msn.c
om/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=w
lmailtagline
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20080426/1dc8d4b8/attachment
-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:02:15 +0530
From: Raj <rajasekhar.l gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] 185 ringing / 199 trying
To: "Hadriel Kaplan" <HKaplan acmepacket.com>
Cc: Karthik Ramiya <Karthik_Ramiya infosys.com>,
"discussion sipforum.org" <discussion sipforum.org>
Message-ID:
<24bc18350804252132o3d88b11dhf39cc5793c7fcac0 mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am unable to find 185 or 199 response in 3261, is it
defined in any other
RFC.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
<HKaplan acmepacket.com>
wrote:
>
> A "reason phrase" is purely descriptive, and
you should NOT expect to
> receive or check for any particular string there.
Please don't expect it to
> be a fixed well-known string, such as the
"defaults" in rfc3261. For
> example lots of devices use different reason-phrases
for 4xx and 5xx error
> responses. Your code should just act on the number,
not the phrase. My 2
> cents anyway.
>
> -hadriel
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-bounces sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-
> > bounces sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Karthik Ramiya
> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:21 AM
> > To: Malay Si; gaurav katiyar; mwilliam prusty;
discussion sipforum.org
> > Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] 185 ringing /
199 trying
> >
> >
> > Hi Malaysi,
> >
> > I agree with you. But here it is clearly
defined like the reason
> > phase is 185 ringing / 199 trying, So you mean
like irrespective of the
> > reason phases, it wll jus look into the 1XX
response and treat it as
> 183??
> > In that case, it means that there wont be any
recognition for the reason
> > phase rite.
> >
> > Please clarify,
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Karthik
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please
visit
> http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion sipforum.org
>
--
-Raaz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/p
ipermail/discussion/attachments/20080426/28497d67/attachment
-0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http:
//sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion sipforum.org
End of discussion Digest, Vol 33, Issue 66
******************************************
|