List Info

Thread: Could you review my draft please?




Could you review my draft please?
user name
2006-06-26 14:57:38
Hi Zhou,

I may want to advertise different presence to different
watchers.
Some commercial presence systems already offer a primitive
version of
this ability now where the presentity advertises
availability to one
group (typically close friends or coworkers) and advertises
that they
are busy to the rest of their watchers.  Similarly, I may
want to
provide very basic presence to most watchers, but very rich
presence,
possibly with geolocation information, to more trusted
watchers.

thanks,
-rohan

I can't do this if only one PIDF document is sent between

On 6/22/06, Harrison Zhou <zhouhonghuawei.com> wrote:
> Dear sip experts,
>
> I've written a draft and this draft describe a new
method for the Presence
> Server to process presence in inter-domain scenarios .
> The new method void duplicated messaging between
Presence Servers.
> I am interested in SIMPLE and will work on it. This is
my first draft and I
> hope someone can review my draft and give me some
comments. Thanks!
>
> you can fetch a copy from:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-zhou-simple-hierarchical-presence-
> 00.txt
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simpleietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Could you review my draft please?
user name
2006-06-26 15:37:52
The below looks similar to a discussion happening in
Jabber's 
Standards JIG, aimed at streamlining presence stanzas
between domains 
in XMPP, which is pretty much the same issue tackled by
Zhou's draft 
here, and I understand things.

It might be useful to examine what is being considered
there.

On Mon Jun 26 15:57:38 2006, Rohan Mahy wrote:
> I may want to advertise different presence to different
watchers.
> Some commercial presence systems already offer a
primitive version 
> of
> this ability now where the presentity advertises
availability to one
> group (typically close friends or coworkers) and
advertises that 
> they
> are busy to the rest of their watchers.  Similarly, I
may want to
> provide very basic presence to most watchers, but very
rich 
> presence,
> possibly with geolocation information, to more trusted
watchers.
> 
> thanks,
> -rohan
> 
> I can't do this if only one PIDF document is sent
between
> 
> On 6/22/06, Harrison Zhou <zhouhonghuawei.com> wrote:
>> Dear sip experts,
>> 
>> I've written a draft and this draft describe a new
method for the 
>> Presence
>> Server to process presence in inter-domain
scenarios .
>> The new method void duplicated messaging between
Presence Servers.
>> I am interested in SIMPLE and will work on it. This
is my first 
>> draft and I
>> hope someone can review my draft and give me some
comments. Thanks!
>> 
>> you can fetch a copy from:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-zhou-simple-hierarchical-presence-
>> 00.txt
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Hong
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Simple mailing list
>> Simpleietf.org
>> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simpleietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:davecridland.net - xmpp:dwdjabber.org
  -
acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Could you review my draft please?
user name
2006-06-27 01:31:55
Hi Rohan,
I think this is a good issue.
I doesn't know how to achieve the function you mentioned in
currently SIMPLE
presence. Maybe a feasible method is : the UA has its policy
to different
watchers, and UA tell its policy to its Presence Server, So
the Presence
Server can show different state to different watchers. Is it
right? So in my
draft, the Presence Server can tell UA's policy to another
Presence Server.

Regards,
Hong

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohan Mahy [mailto:rohan.mahygmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:58 PM
To: Harrison Zhou
Cc: Robert Sparks; hisham.khartabiltelio.no; Jonathan
Rosenberg; Spencer
Dawkins; Miguel.An.Garcianokia.com; noga.torgmail.com;
x.victoriagmail.com; Simple WG
Subject: Re: [Simple] Could you review my draft please?

Hi Zhou,

I may want to advertise different presence to different
watchers.
Some commercial presence systems already offer a primitive
version of
this ability now where the presentity advertises
availability to one
group (typically close friends or coworkers) and advertises
that they
are busy to the rest of their watchers.  Similarly, I may
want to
provide very basic presence to most watchers, but very rich
presence,
possibly with geolocation information, to more trusted
watchers.

thanks,
-rohan

I can't do this if only one PIDF document is sent between

On 6/22/06, Harrison Zhou <zhouhonghuawei.com> wrote:
> Dear sip experts,
>
> I've written a draft and this draft describe a new
method for the Presence
> Server to process presence in inter-domain scenarios .
> The new method void duplicated messaging between
Presence Servers.
> I am interested in SIMPLE and will work on it. This is
my first draft and
I
> hope someone can review my draft and give me some
comments. Thanks!
>
> you can fetch a copy from:
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-zhou-simple-hierarchical-presence-
> 00.txt
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simpleietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>



_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )