List Info

Thread: Presence dictionary. Reviewers needed




Presence dictionary. Reviewers needed
user name
2007-03-29 01:22:18
Hi:

A new version of the presence dictionary is available:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-d
rafts/draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary-03.txt

This version has removed those strings that are 3 characters
or less, as 
per Adam's suggestion.

At this time, I am soliciting for reviewers of the document.
During the 
meeting in Prague we got a few volunteers. I remember Adam
Roach, 
Krisztian Kiss, and Andrew Allen volunteered, but there were
more 
volunteers, although I didn't get their names. Please send
me a note if 
you want to review the document.

A few guidelines for the reviewers:

You should focus on two aspects in the draft:

1) Are all the the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that we can see
in presence 
XML documents included in the dictionary or is there any
missing extension?

2) Is the priority value for each string correct?

Please send your comments to the list and copy myself too.

/Miguel

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

Re: Presence dictionary. Reviewers needed
country flaguser name
United States
2007-03-30 11:17:01
There are mismatches between Appendix A and figure 3.  The
3- 
character strings haven't been removed from the appendix.

On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Miguel Garcia wrote:

> Hi:
>
> A new version of the presence dictionary is available:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-garci
a-simple-presence- 
> dictionary-03.txt
>
> This version has removed those strings that are 3
characters or  
> less, as per Adam's suggestion.
>
> At this time, I am soliciting for reviewers of the
document. During  
> the meeting in Prague we got a few volunteers. I
remember Adam  
> Roach, Krisztian Kiss, and Andrew Allen volunteered,
but there were  
> more volunteers, although I didn't get their names.
Please send me  
> a note if you want to review the document.
>
> A few guidelines for the reviewers:
>
> You should focus on two aspects in the draft:
>
> 1) Are all the the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that we can
see in  
> presence XML documents included in the dictionary or is
there any  
> missing extension?
>
> 2) Is the priority value for each string correct?
>
> Please send your comments to the list and copy myself
too.
>
> /Miguel
>
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simpleietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple


_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

Re: Presence dictionary. Reviewers needed
user name
2007-03-31 02:01:28
Ouch, this is an embarrassing oversight. I forgot to update
the 
Appendix, although the binary dictionary was correctly
updated.

I will create a new version and submitted in the next
hours.

Reviewers, please, hold your review until a new version is
out.

Matthias, thanks for pointing this out.

/Miguel

Matthias Granberry wrote:
> There are mismatches between Appendix A and figure 3. 
The 3-character 
> strings haven't been removed from the appendix.
> 
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Miguel Garcia wrote:
> 
>> Hi:
>>
>> A new version of the presence dictionary is
available:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-d
rafts/draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary-03.txt 
>>
>>
>> This version has removed those strings that are 3
characters or less, 
>> as per Adam's suggestion.
>>
>> At this time, I am soliciting for reviewers of the
document. During 
>> the meeting in Prague we got a few volunteers. I
remember Adam Roach, 
>> Krisztian Kiss, and Andrew Allen volunteered, but
there were more 
>> volunteers, although I didn't get their names.
Please send me a note 
>> if you want to review the document.
>>
>> A few guidelines for the reviewers:
>>
>> You should focus on two aspects in the draft:
>>
>> 1) Are all the the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that we
can see in 
>> presence XML documents included in the dictionary
or is there any 
>> missing extension?
>>
>> 2) Is the priority value for each string correct?
>>
>> Please send your comments to the list and copy
myself too.
>>
>> /Miguel
>>
>> --Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
>> Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Simple mailing list
>> Simpleietf.org
>> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simpleietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )