Ouch, this is an embarrassing oversight. I forgot to update
the
Appendix, although the binary dictionary was correctly
updated.
I will create a new version and submitted in the next
hours.
Reviewers, please, hold your review until a new version is
out.
Matthias, thanks for pointing this out.
/Miguel
Matthias Granberry wrote:
> There are mismatches between Appendix A and figure 3.
The 3-character
> strings haven't been removed from the appendix.
>
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Miguel Garcia wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> A new version of the presence dictionary is
available:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-d
rafts/draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary-03.txt
>>
>>
>> This version has removed those strings that are 3
characters or less,
>> as per Adam's suggestion.
>>
>> At this time, I am soliciting for reviewers of the
document. During
>> the meeting in Prague we got a few volunteers. I
remember Adam Roach,
>> Krisztian Kiss, and Andrew Allen volunteered, but
there were more
>> volunteers, although I didn't get their names.
Please send me a note
>> if you want to review the document.
>>
>> A few guidelines for the reviewers:
>>
>> You should focus on two aspects in the draft:
>>
>> 1) Are all the the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that we
can see in
>> presence XML documents included in the dictionary
or is there any
>> missing extension?
>>
>> 2) Is the priority value for each string correct?
>>
>> Please send your comments to the list and copy
myself too.
>>
>> /Miguel
>>
>> --Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
>> Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Simple mailing list
>> Simple ietf.org
>> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
>
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple ietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
|