Rick, thanks for the new reading material at Linux Gazette.
Jim -- hmmm, thanks for sharing your legwork. A follow-up
questions
that I'll share with the list...
- Is this fine/safe to use with RHEL systems despite Centos
being
stamped all over the link you shared?
On the topic of old unsupported RHEL systems(no standard
package
updating happening) -- I seem to dimly recall someone in the
group
telling me of a RHEL -> Centos/Whitebox conversion method
that wasn't
too painful. No, I haven't even searched for such a thing
yet but I
will after hearing anything back from y'all.
--
jt
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jim Stockford (jim.stockford gmail.com):
>
>
>> I don't know what's the equivalent for
debian-based systems.
>>
>
> Er, you just do standard package updating, as usual.
If you've been
> doing that, it should already be long ago taken care
of.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sf-lug mailing list
> sf-lug linuxmafia.com
> http://
linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
>
_______________________________________________
sf-lug mailing list
sf-lug linuxmafia.com
http://
linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/sf-lug
|