VOTE: cosmo/scooby merge

we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for over a
week now,
and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like to
get a formal
sense of the community's position on the issue, so i'm
calling for a
vote.

please reply to this message with:

 * [ ]   +1 - i am in favor of scooby and cosmo merging into
a single product
 * [ ]   +0 - i am neutral on the issue
 * [ ]   -1 - i would prefer to see scooby and cosmo remain
as separate products

also please summarize any issues you have with the merge
(refer to
earlier discussion if necessary, but please do not re-open
debate).

all votes cast are non-binding. the final decision will be
made by the
product teams within osaf. this vote is simply to get a
clear view on
where the community stands.

i will close the vote at the end of the day, monday 7/24.
we'll make a
final decision on the issue soon after.

thanks everybody for the spirited debate! we got a lot of
issues out
on the table, and i you all feel a little more invested in
the
projects.
_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+/- 0

I'm more or less neutral on the issue. I like the idea of
Scooby  
remaining separate so it can act as a front-end to other
(non- 
existent as of now) servers. It is also just feels right
that they  
remain separate, probably because of stuff that Jared
mentioned, like  
how traditionally UNIX daemons are headless services and
ui's talk to  
them over sockets. And partly, I'm just used to it.

On the other hand, I'm into the code reduction, the
simplification in  
architecture.

Bobby


On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.
>
> please reply to this message with:
>
> * [ ]   +1 - i am in favor of scooby and cosmo merging
into a  
> single product
> * [ ]   +0 - i am neutral on the issue
> * [ ]   -1 - i would prefer to see scooby and cosmo
remain as  
> separate products
>
> also please summarize any issues you have with the
merge (refer to
> earlier discussion if necessary, but please do not
re-open debate).
>
> all votes cast are non-binding. the final decision will
be made by the
> product teams within osaf. this vote is simply to get a
clear view on
> where the community stands.
>
> i will close the vote at the end of the day, monday
7/24. we'll make a
> final decision on the issue soon after.
>
> thanks everybody for the spirited debate! we got a lot
of issues out
> on the table, and i you all feel a little more invested
in the
> projects.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+0

On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.
>
> please reply to this message with:
>
> * [ ]   +1 - i am in favor of scooby and cosmo merging
into a single 
> product
> * [ ]   +0 - i am neutral on the issue
> * [ ]   -1 - i would prefer to see scooby and cosmo
remain as separate 
> products
>
> also please summarize any issues you have with the
merge (refer to
> earlier discussion if necessary, but please do not
re-open debate).
>
> all votes cast are non-binding. the final decision will
be made by the
> product teams within osaf. this vote is simply to get a
clear view on
> where the community stands.
>
> i will close the vote at the end of the day, monday
7/24. we'll make a
> final decision on the issue soon after.
>
> thanks everybody for the spirited debate! we got a lot
of issues out
> on the table, and i you all feel a little more invested
in the
> projects.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev
>
>
---
Bear

Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
bearosafoundation.org
http://www.osafoundation
.org

bearcode-bear.com
http://code-bear.com

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822
40B3 CD29


_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.

+1, of course. i think that the two products should have
been merged
from the beginning, but this only became clear to me in
hindsight.
_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+1 - Product line simplification makes it easier to explain
our
solution to prospective users.

On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> > we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal
for over a week now,
> > and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd
like to get a formal
> > sense of the community's position on the issue,
so i'm calling for a
> > vote.
>
> +1, of course. i think that the two products should
have been merged
> from the beginning, but this only became clear to me in
hindsight.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev
>
_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+0

On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.
>
> please reply to this message with:
>
> * [ ]   +1 - i am in favor of scooby and cosmo merging
into a single 
> product
> * [ ]   +0 - i am neutral on the issue
> * [ ]   -1 - i would prefer to see scooby and cosmo
remain as separate 
> products
>
> also please summarize any issues you have with the
merge (refer to
> earlier discussion if necessary, but please do not
re-open debate).
>
> all votes cast are non-binding. the final decision will
be made by the
> product teams within osaf. this vote is simply to get a
clear view on
> where the community stands.
>
> i will close the vote at the end of the day, monday
7/24. we'll make a
> final decision on the issue soon after.
>
> thanks everybody for the spirited debate! we got a lot
of issues out
> on the table, and i you all feel a little more invested
in the
> projects.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev
>
>
---
Bear

Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
bearosafoundation.org
http://www.osafoundation
.org

bearcode-bear.com
http://code-bear.com

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822
40B3 CD29


_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+/- 0

I'm more or less neutral on the issue. I like the idea of
Scooby  
remaining separate so it can act as a front-end to other
(non- 
existent as of now) servers. It is also just feels right
that they  
remain separate, probably because of stuff that Jared
mentioned, like  
how traditionally UNIX daemons are headless services and
ui's talk to  
them over sockets. And partly, I'm just used to it.

On the other hand, I'm into the code reduction, the
simplification in  
architecture.

Bobby


On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.
>
> please reply to this message with:
>
> * [ ]   +1 - i am in favor of scooby and cosmo merging
into a  
> single product
> * [ ]   +0 - i am neutral on the issue
> * [ ]   -1 - i would prefer to see scooby and cosmo
remain as  
> separate products
>
> also please summarize any issues you have with the
merge (refer to
> earlier discussion if necessary, but please do not
re-open debate).
>
> all votes cast are non-binding. the final decision will
be made by the
> product teams within osaf. this vote is simply to get a
clear view on
> where the community stands.
>
> i will close the vote at the end of the day, monday
7/24. we'll make a
> final decision on the issue soon after.
>
> thanks everybody for the spirited debate! we got a lot
of issues out
> on the table, and i you all feel a little more invested
in the
> projects.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal for
over a week now,
> and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd like
to get a formal
> sense of the community's position on the issue, so
i'm calling for a
> vote.

+1, of course. i think that the two products should have
been merged
from the beginning, but this only became clear to me in
hindsight.
_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev

+1 - Product line simplification makes it easier to explain
our
solution to prospective users.

On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Brian Moseley <bcmosafoundation.org>
wrote:
> > we've discussed the cosmo/scooby merge proposal
for over a week now,
> > and it looks like the debates are winding up. i'd
like to get a formal
> > sense of the community's position on the issue,
so i'm calling for a
> > vote.
>
> +1, of course. i think that the two products should
have been merged
> from the beginning, but this only became clear to me in
hindsight.
> _______________________________________________
> scooby-dev mailing list
> scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev
>
_______________________________________________
scooby-dev mailing list
scooby-devlists.osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman
/listinfo/scooby-dev