List Info

Thread: Free One way Links




Free One way Links
user name
2006-08-02 05:15:17
Hi,

I just opened my new directory.

http:
//www.what-is-internet-marketing.com/links

Please feel free to add your website to my directory. No
reciprocal
link required.

Thanks
http://www.
what-is-internet-marketing.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Search Engine Marketing Strategy"
group.
To post to this group, send email to
search-engine-marketing-strategygooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
search-engine-marketing-strategy-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/search-engine-mark
eting-strategy
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

why no SASL in sendmail?
user name
2006-08-02 06:02:31
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:47:18 -0500
>From: J Moore <jaymocullmail.com>  
>Subject: why no SASL in sendmail?  
>To: miscopenbsd.org
>
>I need to support mail for mobile users. Consensus
appears to be that 
>this is best done w/ a combination of SASL
(authentication) & STARTTLS 
>(encryption). However, sendmail isn't compiled with
SASL support: 
>
># sendmail -d0.1 -bv
>Version 8.13.4
> Compiled with: DNSMAP LOG MAP_REGEX MATCHGECOS MILTER
MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7
>                NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 NETUNIX
NEWDB NIS PIPELINING
>                SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS USERDB XDEBUG
>
>Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but is this
because there are 
>issues with SASL? Or is there a "better way"
to provide smtp services 
>for mobile users?
>

i believe this has been beaten to death. search the archives
for the remains.

cheers,
jake

>Thnx,
>J

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )