List Info

Thread: Re: URL +1, LSID -1
Re: URL +1, LSID -1
country flaguser name
Austria		 2007-07-10 22:19:08 

  


  

    

> I sort of regret the commons/type/source/id structure I chose for
> our PURLs; doing commons/source/type/id would have been better, I
> think, and commons/source/id.type is not terrible.


"+1"


 


I would actually prefer the "commons/source/id.type" pattern, if it can be implemented with the current purl.org system. It is more intuitive to most developers/users and it brings the elements of the URI into a nice hierarchical order. 


 ;


- Matthias


  

  
  
   
     
    

  

    Re: URL +1, LSID -1
  


  

     country flaguser name
Switzerland		
     2007-07-11 02:16:10
  


  

    
Matthias Samwald wrote:
> I would actually prefer the
"commons/source/id.type" pattern, if it can 
> be implemented with the current purl.org system. It is
more intuitive to 
> most developers/users and it brings the elements of the
URI into a nice 
> hierarchical order.

id.type certainly seems like a good idea for the actual URL
of a specific 
representation, as anything else doesn't "Save
as..." well (except perhaps 
web pages, where browsers are smart enough to propose the
.html extension).




  


  

    
  

  
  
   
     
    






 [1-2]











   
 





about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )