Fw: draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00: What is impact on response?

Thread: Fw: draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00: What is impact on response?

Search this list only Search all lists
Fw: draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses- 00: What is impact on response?
United States	2007-11-22 18:28:20
Janet P Gunn/FED/CSC wrote on 11/22/2007 03:14:07 PM: &gt; I just want to point out that, for the use case presented in draft- &gt; gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00,   > the "priority status of the call target&quot; is not relevant.  Priority > treatment is dependant > entirely on the priority status of the calling party. > > There might be other use case/scenarios which do depend on the > priority status of the call target- but not this one. > > Janet > > Dean Willis <dean.willissoftarmor.com> wrote on 11/21/2007 03:14:24 PM: > > > > > I'm still struggling with the rph-in-response question. I was hoping   &gt; > to get some insight from draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00,   > > but I'm still left unclear on a few points. > > > > For the record, this draft adds supporting rationale for draft-polk- > > sip-rph-in-responses-00.txt. &gt; > > > I understand from this draft that a node making a call that would &nbsp; > > need RPH information might not know what RPH value would apply at the   &gt; > time the call is launched by sending INVITE. This is because the   &gt; > priority granted will depend on external factors, including   &gt; > potentially the priority status of the call target. So we need a way   &gt; > to inform the network elements along the path (including the UAC) as   &gt; > to what priority they should grant the call. &gt; > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >; > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use sip-implementorscs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > > Use sippingietf.org for new developments on the application of sip