List Info

Thread: Fw: draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00: What is impact on response?




Fw: draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses- 00: What is impact on response?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-11-22 18:28:20



Janet P Gunn/FED/CSC wrote on 11/22/2007 03:14:07 PM:

> I just want to point out that, for the use case presented in draft-
> gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00,  

> the "priority status of the call target" is not relevant.  Priority
> treatment is dependant

> entirely on the priority status of the calling party.
>
> There might be other use case/scenarios which do depend on the
> priority status of the call target- but not this one.

>
> Janet

>
> Dean Willis <dean.willissoftarmor.com> wrote on 11/21/2007 03:14:24 PM:
>
> >
> > I'm still struggling with the rph-in-response question. I was hoping  
&gt; > to get some insight from draft-gunn-sip-req-for-rph-in-responses-00,  
> > but I'm still left unclear on a few points.
> >
> > For the record, this draft adds supporting rationale for draft-polk-
> > sip-rph-in-responses-00.txt.
&gt; >
> > I understand from this draft that a node making a call that would &nbsp;
> > need RPH information might not know what RPH value would apply at the  
&gt; > time the call is launched by sending INVITE. This is because the  
&gt; > priority granted will depend on external factors, including  
&gt; > potentially the priority status of the call target. So we need a way  
&gt; > to inform the network elements along the path (including the UAC) as  
&gt; > to what priority they should grant the call.
&gt; >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
>; > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> > Use sip-implementorscs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> > Use sippingietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )