Dean,
So are you saying the ignores the Require:100rel in the
response and
then fails to send the PRACK?
And then the UAS is supposed to not mind that it isn't
getting the PRACK???
This is *so* broken that we shouldn't even be discussing
it.
Paul
Dean Willis wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>
>> I disbelieve that there are any UAs that claim
support for 100rel and
>> don't pay attention to the answer in the 180.
>> Please show me one (send me traces please).
>>
>
> I believe I have some that also ignore the 100-rel,
neither sending a
> prack nor paying attention to the answer.
>
>> Are you mixing the non-reliable 18x case in here?
(I think that might
>> be where you're coming from since you say
"older" UAs).'
>> That's not what we're discussing. Repeating the
answer in the 200 here
>> makes sense.
>
> For some really old UAs, this is the same use case.
>>
>> And what do you mean "rejects the 180"?
That makes no sense.
>
> Some nodes will treat an SDP-bearing 183 as a
non-SDP-bearing 180.
> Others will just ignore the whole response.
>
>>
>> Do you have a UAS that's tries to send 100rel
responses when the UA
>> hasn't indicated support?
>>
>
> Ah now, that's a better question. I don't have such a
thing, but I
> wouldn't be surprised if it happened.
>
> --
> Dean
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://ww
w1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors cs.columbia.edu for questions on current
sip
Use sippingietf.org for new developments on the application of
sip
|