Dale.Worley comcast.net wrote:
> After thinking about this some more, I'll retract my
objection. In
> principle, I think the problem still stands, but this
case is simple
> enough that no trouble can result.
>
> Do note: You introduce the table in section 5, which
is marked
> non-normative. But you refer to the table 16 times in
section 8,
> which is marked normative, and furthermore you don't
re-introduce the
> table or its behavior. Which, unless I've overlooked
something again,
> means that the normative section 8 contains a
prerequisite reference
> to the non-normative section 5. I think you're going
to have to
> adjust that.
OK; that is reasonable.
> I doubt harm can come from it, but I don't see the
Posix programming
> model as being one of the background domains for
understanding SIP.
> Suppose, for example, that one's SIP stack was written
in Java...
Why, convert it to C/C++, of course But
seriously, I will
add some text equating the alias descriptor to connection
objects
found in other languages.
Thanks, Dale.
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg {alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.al
catel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://ww
w1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors cs.columbia.edu for questions on current
sip
Use sipping ietf.org for new developments on the application of
sip
|