> Though IPv6 was initially designed to address the IP
address
> space issue, I feel like the mobility feature afforded
by
> IPv6 address design is a true value added.
>
> When we are mapping from IPv6 to IPv4, we will
certainly
> loose some information. However, when we are mapping
from
> IPv4 to IPv6, how can we expand the digits in a way
that we
> can actually make the mapped IPv6 address to support
> mobility?
The IPv6 mobility topic would likely be beyond intended
purpose of the
draft.
Your question would potentially be relevant to
draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition.
If IPv6 mobility has impacts upon SIP which have not been
analyzed
within SIPPING or another working group, the community would
likely
welcome the analysis even if it doesn't produce new SIP
related
requirements.
Thanks,
Brett
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://ww
w1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors cs.columbia.edu for questions on current
sip
Use sippingietf.org for new developments on the application of
sip
|
