Not that I like responding to my incoherent posts, but this
one totally
failed to make sense. I've got to stop posting after
midnight and before
noon.
Dean Willis mumbled:
>
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>>
>> Do you think its ok for the message to contain
html?
>>
>
> That's actually debatable.
>
> HTML at least has relatively standard
"rendering" -- XML, especially
> in the absence of some kind of style sheet, doesn't.
>
>> If you rendered html text directly it would also
confuse your mom.
>
>
> True. It would be nice to make sue her UA supports HTML
before sending
That's "make sure her UA supports HTML before sending
it" . . .
> it to her, wouldn't it?
>
> But at least here (this use of MESSAGE) we have an
existing way to say
> "I don't support that MIME type in a
render-to-user context", which may
> be adequate. That does put is in a better position than
we were with INFO.
That should have read "does put us in a batter
position than we were
with INFO".
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://ww
w1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors cs.columbia.edu for questions on current
sip
Use sippingietf.org for new developments on the application of
sip
|
