List Info

Thread: RE: S2: input by method for validations




RE: S2: input by method for validations
country flaguser name
United States
2007-11-06 11:59:43
You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
configure the name of the input result as an
interceptor param; I don't know if they support
parsing, though.

d.

--- Manuel Correa <mcorreaitos.uga.edu> wrote:

> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
> The problem is the result: The input. When something
> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
> of the method which is the input.
> 
> Manuel Correa.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfagmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
> 
> the name of the XML must be like
> 
> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
> 
> so you must rename your xml to
> 
> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> 
> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> 
> 
> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mcorreaitos.uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > I need to define a custom input for method in the
> same action.
> >
> >
> >
> > For example, I have the "methodA"  that
receive
> the information from
> > inputA.jsp
> >
> > I have "methodB" that receive from
inputB.jsp
> >
> > I use the validation for each one:
> >
> >
> >
> > classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> >
> > classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem occurs  when  the validations
> fails(some input field is
> > wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
> case are two inputs in
> > the same Action but in different methods... In
> some way to say to the
> > action the default input.
> >
> >
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > <result
name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result
name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result
name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result> 
> (Other method by default
> > use the input)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But he validations understands to which input
> goes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Manuel Correa.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribestruts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> user-helpstruts.apache.org
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribestruts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-helpstruts.apache.org


RE: S2: input by method for validations
country flaguser name
United States
2007-11-06 12:34:40
I found this:
<interceptor-ref name="workflow">
 			<param name="inputResultName"
>inputA</param>
 			</interceptor-ref>

That is the way that you can change the default input. 
My question is:

I using wildcards for instance the methods... I can do
this:

<interceptor-ref name="workflow">
 			<param name="inputResultName"
>input_</param>    (This doesn't work)
 			</interceptor-ref>

I need to find a way to define dynamically the input depends
of the method that is call.!! 
Thanks 

Manuel Correa.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Newton [mailto:newton.daveyahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:00 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: S2: input by method for validations

You *might* be able to use an OGNL property to
configure the name of the input result as an
interceptor param; I don't know if they support
parsing, though.

d.

--- Manuel Correa <mcorreaitos.uga.edu> wrote:

> The validations works fine. Sorry about the mistake.
> The problem is the result: The input. When something
> is wrong with the fields..by default the validation
> stack forward to the INPUT, I need to define depends
> of the method which is the input.
> 
> Manuel Correa.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: F�tima Silveira [mailto:fawixfagmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:20 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: S2: input by method for validations
> 
> the name of the XML must be like
> 
> ClassName-actionAlias_methodName-validation.xml
> 
> so you must rename your xml to
> 
> Class-classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> 
> Class-classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> 
> 
> On 11/6/07, Manuel Correa <mcorreaitos.uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > I need to define a custom input for method in the
> same action.
> >
> >
> >
> > For example, I have the "methodA"  that
receive
> the information from
> > inputA.jsp
> >
> > I have "methodB" that receive from
inputB.jsp
> >
> > I use the validation for each one:
> >
> >
> >
> > classAction_methodA-validation.xml
> >
> > classAction_methodB-validation.xml
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem occurs  when  the validations
> fails(some input field is
> > wrong) and need to redirect to the input. In this
> case are two inputs in
> > the same Action but in different methods... In
> some way to say to the
> > action the default input.
> >
> >
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > <result
name="inputA">inputA.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result
name="inputB">inputB.jsp</result>
> >
> >
> >
> > <result
name="input">inputDefault.jsp</result> 
> (Other method by default
> > use the input)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But he validations understands to which input
> goes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Manuel Correa.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribestruts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> user-helpstruts.apache.org
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribestruts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-helpstruts.apache.org


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribestruts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-helpstruts.apache.org


[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )