List Info

Thread: Subclipse and Subversive cooperation




Subclipse and Subversive cooperation
user name
2006-04-15 12:32:24
Igor,
I think everyone is in agreement that there needs to be an 'official' SVN client hosted at eclipse.org.  The question is, what form will it take and who will support it.

Creating a new SVN project at eclipse.org has a unique set of problems.  Most notably, the total lack of SVN infrastructure (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=131096).  Presumably, an SVN based product should be hosted on a subversion repository.  Until the infrastructure is there this whole project looks like a non starter.

The other hurdle is the lack of interest from Platform/Team.  While there are no Eclipse projects that are using Subversion, they have little interest in getting involved with another version control system.  They already have their hands full with CVS.  It is an unfortunate Catch-22.

As Mark mentioned, Subversive has a unique hurdle as it is tied to JavaSVN which does not have an ASF, CPL or EPL license.  Eclipse have very strict guidelines on licensing and it is unlikely they would accept JavaSVN as a dependency while it has a custom license.  Perhaps one way around this is to move JavaSVN under the Eclipse umbrella and continue to develop it as part of the SVN client project (if Alex is willing).

Speaking for myself, the problem I have with joining with the Subversive team is a lack of trust.  To me, the initial reason of Polarion creating Subversive are still unclear to me, which makes me distrustful.  If the goal all along was to add SVN support to the base Eclipse SDK, then why wasn't a technology project setup at eclipse.org before you started coding?  It would have been an excellent opportunity for collaboration.

As for cooperating, that depends on how you define it.  If you mean drop Subclipse and work on Subversive, then the answer is "no". ; If the official SVN integration were a whole new product that reused neither Subclipse, not Subversive then i would consider it, so long as it were developed with the help/guidance of Platform/Team.  Right now, that is the only approach that will satisfy both parties.

Could you please make your project proposal public so we can have a look at it.  Right now, we don't really know what you are proposing.

Cheers,
Brock

Igor Vinnykov wrote:
Deiotariana.local" type="cite">

Dear Subclipse Team,

 

We were pleased to see that Subclipse reached release 1.0.0. In near future we also plan to release version 1.0.0 of Subversive. What is the next? It’s pretty important question for both our teams. I think that we have similar aims – provide high quality SVN support for Eclipse. If so the natural next step is joining to eclipse.org. Joining to eclipse.org is one of the most important goals for us and now we are under discussion with eclipse.org staff. It’s not a secret that many people in community want to see SVN support in standard Eclipse distribution. I think that it’s very likely that eclipse.org will integrate SVN plugin in near future. Such step will be really important for all SVN community, but from the other side require a lot of efforts. If we will join our forces we can reach this goal faster and at the end can deliver more quality tool. Do you see the space for our teams̵7; cooperation? I think that it should be positive answer, because the only serious argument against it is different goals (the rest can be resolved quickly), but it’s not our case.

 

As we write in our message to community we consider Subversive as solid open-source ground for Polarion commercial tools, because only having this ground we can reach the success. Please understand that our commercial tools are not contradicted to our open-source goals. If anybody has questions or doubts – please feel free to ask and we will be happy to explain all aspects of our vision.

 

Please feel free to use my contacts listed below.

 

Best regards,

Igor Vinnykov

Polarion Team

 

E-mail: igor.vinnykov (at) polarion.org

ICQ: 176097702

Skype: i.vinnykov

 


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )