Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> i have taken a look into the discussion...
>
>> These are intended, yes; all of these (implicit dot
by default, 'skip'
>> messages, and default depth) were discussed when
the changes were made.
>> The changes were committed in r29671 and r29672,
following discussions
>> in the following threads:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.vers
ion-control.subversion.devel/97003
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.vers
ion-control.subversion.devel/96711
>>
>>
>> While I wrote some of this code, I won't object to
removing it if the
>> concensus is to remove it.
>
> So the result would be to give the people who are
working on the book a
> hint, that the described behavior(usage) in the book is
not the way SVN
> currently behaves...
Yes, I've fallen behind on tracking the latest evolutions of
the changelist
command. I've cc:ed svnbook-dev red-bean.com as a reminder
to fix this
soonishly.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilatocollab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <>
Distributed Development On Demand
_______________________________________________
svnbook-dev mailing list
svnbook-devred-bean.com
http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev
|
