excellent news, thanks joe.
i look forward to checking it out,
jae.
Joe Simms wrote:
> HiJason
>
> I supplied a patch that fixed this, r2051 and r2053, so
you can
> declare fks in seperate tables, and also override the
plugins
> schema.yml files by prefixing them with the
pluginName-, and placing
> this file in the projects config directory.
>
> Fabien and i are working on a way that will allow you
to override the
> model classes as well, as these IMHO, should be
generated in the
> projects lib/model/pluginName directory instead of in
the plugin
> lib/model directory, but including access to model
methods defined in
> the plugin.
>
> Combine the above with the new sfMixin class (r2079),
that allows you
> to add methods to factory classes, and you will have a
truly
> extensible plugin system ;)
>
> hope that helps
>
> thanks
>
> joe
>
>
> On 17 Sep 2006, at 14:55, jason rowe wrote:
>
>> i think i am correct in saying that it is not
possible for propel to
>> handle related tables that exist in different
schema files.
>>
>> i wonder if the propel-build-* commands could
gather the relevant
>> schema.xml and .yml files and combine them before
passing the file
>> contents to propel. this would enable us to write
plugins that can
>> easily extend from the sfGuard user class and so
on.
>>
>> i feel the advantage of using a dao layer is lost
if you can not both
>> seperate code into plugins/chunks and keep the ease
of use of
>> relatedness in the layer.
>>
>> feel free to tell me how to do this if i am wrong
>>
>> all the best
>> jason rowe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe symfony-project.com
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help symfony-project.com
>>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe symfony-project.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help symfony-project.com
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe symfony-project.com
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help symfony-project.com
|