List Info

Thread: Q&A: Using 'Broadcast' in Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping, Cisco's Broadband Mesh Push, More




Q&A: Using 'Broadcast' in Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping, Cisco's Broadband Mesh Push, More
country flaguser name
United States
2007-07-24 15:36:27
TCPmag.com
http://tcpmag.com/
http://tcpmag.com/rss
July 24, 2007
Editor: Gladys Rama (grama1105media.com)

------------------------------------------------------------
------------
THIS ISSUE SPONSORED BY:

- Vyatta: Open-Source Cisco Secure Router Alternative
http://in
fo.101com.com/default.asp?id=40849

- Centralized Control and Repair of Remote IT Devices
http://in
fo.101com.com/default.asp?id=41037

- Scripting and Automation Training at TechMentor Vegas
http://in
fo.101com.com/default.asp?id=41038
------------------------------------------------------------
------------

IN THIS ISSUE OF TCPmag.com:

1. Q&A: Using 'Broadcast' in Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping
2. What's New on TCPmag.com 
3. Interesting Employment in California, Virginia

************************************************************
************
SPONSOR: Vyatta: Open-Source Cisco Secure Router
Alternative
************************************************************
************
Vyatta software and appliances are Linux-based, open-source
networking 
(router, firewall, VPN) solutions that leverage x86 hardware
and 
components to deliver a flexible, affordable alternative to
Cisco 
1800 through 7200 series routers. 

Free Software, Whitepapers, Webinars...
http://i
nfo.101com.com/default.aspx?id=40849
************************************************************
************

1. Q&A: Using 'Broadcast' in Layer 3 to Layer 2 Mapping

Send your toughest Cisco technical questions to editortcpmag.com 
with the subject line "Attn: Scott."

Scott,

I am confused about few things. Could you please clarify
these points? 

 1. Should we use the "broadcast" keyword when
mapping a Layer 3 to
    Layer 2 address in frame relay for both point-to-point
and
    point-to-multipoint networks?

 2. In IPv6 implementation over frame relay, why are we
mapping remote
    link-local addresses to DLCI as link-local addresses are
local to
    the segment, and why should we map these link-local
addresses to
    DLCI in frame relay? 

-- Zubedi

------------------------------

Zubedi,

Excellent questions. And by the diverse nature of them, I'm
going to 
assume you're working on studying for the CCIE Routing &
Switching 
lab exam (call it a hunch!).

So, let's see what we have, starting with question No. 1.
When you 
talk about mapping Layer 3 to a Layer 2 address, let's think
about 
why/when this needs to take place. Since you mention both a

point-to-point and a point-to-multipoint interface, we'll
think 
about both.

In a point-to-multipoint world, there are many potential
Layer 2 
destinations for any Layer 3 address. If our multipoint
interface 
were an Ethernet segment, we would use ARP to say "Who
has x.x.x.x IP 
address?" But in the non-broadcast, multiple-access
(NBMA) world of 
frame relay, we can't do that.

Outside of the evil, twisted world that CCIE candidates live
in, we 
would likely use something sane like inverse ARP to assist
us with 
the mapping. But since we aren't allowed to do simple things
like 
that, we'll have to manually map the address. Now, we are
manually 
mapping what something like ARP would have done
automatically. 

We're saying, "If I have a packet to this IP address,
it will go to 
this Layer 2 (DLCI) address." So that's the first
piece. But you're 
asking specifically about the "broadcast" keyword
on that frame 
relay map statement. The short answer is: "It
depends."

Once we have our map committed (without
"broadcast"), we should be 
able to ping the other side, because our router can now
resolve 
from the Layer 3 address it knows is on a directly connected

interface down to a Layer 2 address which that interface
will use 
to reach the destination. That will handle ANY unicast
operation. 
The trick, of course, is that by default most of our routing

protocols use multicast or broadcast destination addresses.
And 
without the use of the "broadcast" parameter, no
group addressing 
is allowed.

This is true for IP multicast streams, as well, but the
routing 
protocols are generally the more obvious impact of not
putting 
the "broadcast" parameter on the map statement.
Using "debug IP 
packet," you may see many "encapsulation
failed" messages on any 
broadcast or multicast destination going out.

The next extension to this same question is: "How many
times do 
I need that 'broadcast' parameter?" The answer is once
per DLCI.

Even if you have multiple IPs mapping to the same DLCI, only
put 
the "broadcast" parameter on one of them. In a lab
environment, 
we likely wouldn't care. But in real life (and doing labs is

always good practice for real life), overuse of
"broadcast" can 
have a huge impact on a router. If we had more than one map
to 
the same DLCI with "broadcast," that DLCI would
receive multiple 
copies of every single multicast and take up processing and

bandwidth to do so. 

For the point-to-point interfaces, though, there's no
ability to 
use a "frame relay map" command or anything with
the "broadcast" 
parameter. It's a different thought process. In
point-to-point 
interfaces, broadcasts will inherently work. In thinking
through 
things we'll find that the logic is: "If it's not my
address, it 
must be yours." And that applies for unicasts,
broadcasts and 
multicast packets (frame relay voodoo magic). 

For question No. 2, IPv6 is a different protocol, but you
can follow 
the same basic rules that we went over above. If there isn't
any 
magic mapping for us, you'll need to manually map any
reachable 
address. And while you note that the link-local (FE80::/64)

addresses are only good on a particular link, in the frame
relay 
world the DLCI IS that link. So it's the same rules applied
to a 
different protocol.

Everything that a router originates itself in IPv6 will be
generated 
from the link-local address by default, so multiple mappings
may 
be needed.

Hope that helps,

-- Scott

Scott Morris, quadruple CCIE, JNCIE and all-around
Uber-Geek, can often 
be seen traveling around the world consulting and delivering
CCIE 
training. He has recently stepped up as VP of Curriculum
Development 
for IPexpert and will oversee a new consulting practice. For
more 
information on him check out http://www.ipexpert.com.


Miss a Q&A? Go online to http://tcpmag.com/qanda/

To comment on this Q&A, go to:

http://tcpmag.com/qanda/article.asp?editorialsid=385

************************************************************
************
SPONSOR: Centralized Control and Repair of Remote IT
Devices
************************************************************
************
Out-Of-Band (OOB) Management, focused on achieving strong
ROI through 
centralized control and repair of local and remote IT
infrastructure 
devices, has been a growing niche market for many years.
This report 
assesses the OOB market and the drivers that are taking it
into the 
mainstream. 

Read this free report today!
http://in
fo.101com.com/default.asp?id=41037
************************************************************
************

2. What's New on TCPmag.com

NEWS: "Behind Cisco's Push Into Broadband Mesh"
You might have missed it, but Cisco Systems Inc. last month
launched 
its Cisco Cable ServiceMesh offering, a new line of Wi-Fi
mesh 
offerings designed with cable operators in mind.

http://tcpmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=1244

NEWS: "Juniper Takes Fight to Cisco With Branch Office
Push"
Cisco Systems Inc. archrival Juniper Networks this month
expanded its 
line of branch office solutions -- and ratcheted up the
pressure on 
Cisco -- by introducing its J2320 and J2350 J-series
services routers, 
its Secure Services Gateway 320M (SSG 320M) and SSG 350M
security 
platforms, two new network management appliances, and
Juniper NSMXpress. 

http://tcpmag.com/news/article.asp?editorialsid=1245

RSS FEEDS ON TCPMAG.COM
If you're running an RSS client, then consider signing up
for feeds
from TCPmag.com. You'll automatically be notified when new
content
is posted. Learn more here: http://tcpmag.com/rss/

------------------------------------------------------------
------------

3. Interesting Employment in California, Virginia

Job postings courtesy of Monster.com.

GEN-PROBE INC., NETWORK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR
Position Type: Full time
Location: San Diego, Calif.
Salary: Not specified
Experience: 2 to 5 years
Desired Education: Associate's degree, CCNA

The network system administrator will be responsible for
ensuring the
network's security and availability, performing daily router
and switch
configuration, monitoring system VPN and firewall, and
maintaining 
documentation. Knowledge of Cisco equipment, protocols and 
services required.

To learn more, visit:

http://jobview.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=60370939

-----------------------------

MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, SENIOR SYSTEMS
ADMINISTRATOR 
Position Type: Full time 
Location: Manassas, Va.
Salary: Not specified
Experience: At least 4 years
Desired Education: Bachelor's degree, CCNA, MCSE

Main responsibilities include providing assistance to users,

identifying and troubleshooting problems, maintaining daily
system 
logs, and ensuring that customers' hardware and software
needs are
met. Must have experience in Windows 2000/2003 and LAN/WAN 
environments, and have knowledge of Department of Defense
standards. 
SCI and TS clearance required.

To learn more, visit:

http://jobview.monster.com/getjob.asp?JobID=60372377

************************************************************
************
SPONSOR: Scripting and Automation Training at TechMentor
Vegas
************************************************************
************
Whether you’re looking to avoid mindless repetition, improve

consistency, reduce errors, increase your personal
"bandwidth," or 
just go home sooner each day, administrative automation is
your answer.
Learn how to use Windows PowerShell, VBScript, command-line
tools, 
batch files and more. Register by August 1 and save $300!

TechMentor Conference | October 15-19 | Las Vegas
http://in
fo.101com.com/default.asp?id=41038
************************************************************
************

FREE MAGAZINE OFFERS
Subscribe now to our free monthly magazines:

NEW! Redmond Developer News magazine
https://subscribe.1105pubs.com/sub/RW?WP=NEW
FREE&TC=1&PC=MK5

Redmond Channel Partner magazine
https://subscribe.1105pubs.com/sub/RN?WP=NE
WFREE&TC=1&P=OCP01

Redmond magazine
https://subscribe.1105pubs.com/sub/MI?WP=NEWF
REE&TC=1&P=TCP

Sign up for all our related FREE newsletters today.  
https://newsletters.1105pubs.com/nl/RMG.do?NL=49
00&PC=TCPNLF

Encourage your peers to excel! 
Please forward this newsletter to any IT professional. 

************************************************************
************

To learn how you can sponsor a future edition of this
newsletter,
contact Matt Morollo at (508) 532-1418 or 
e-mail mmorollo1105media.com

Contact the editorial staff at editortcpmag.com

Newsletter problems: RED1105service.com  

TCPmag.com
Redmond Media Group
16261 Laguna Canyon Road, Suite 130
Irvine, CA 92618-3608
Phone 949-265-1520

************************************************************
************
UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE E-MAIL ADDRESS:

https://newsletters.1105pubs.com/nl/RMGf.do?e=nesstosharedlog.com&NL=4900
************************************************************
************

To review our Privacy Policy, visit our Web site at 
http://www.1105
media.com/privacy.aspx

Copyright 2007 1105 Media Inc. TCPmag.com News may 
only be redistributed in its unedited form. Written
permission 
from the editor must be obtained to reprint the information

contained within this newsletter. Contact: editortcpmag.com               

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )