List Info

Thread: build failure without docbook-utils




build failure without docbook-utils
user name
2006-06-16 18:01:49

Makefile.in is a generated file, so you can't patch that.
You need to patch Makefile.am. But I can't see anything
that is wrong there. What options did you pass to
./configure?

Chris

--
TaskJuggler Developer

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-helpsuse.com

build failure without docbook-utils
user name
2006-07-13 09:03:31

ok, ok I'm wrong
now attach patch to Makefile.am:
5c5,7
<       $(DOCBOOK_TO_MAN) --to-stdout $< > $
---
>       if test "$" !=
"no" ; then \
>                 $(DOCBOOK_TO_MAN) --to-stdout $<
> $ ; \
>         fi

I don't pass any options to ./configure but executin
'make' I receive following message:
no --to-stdout taskjuggler.xml > taskjuggler.1
/bin/sh: no: command not found
make[3]: *** [taskjuggler.1] Error 127


seems make try to execute command 'no', I think because my
linux box have not installed docbook package, then configure
work well to if docbook is not installed and assign to
DOCBOOK_TO_MAN the correct value 'no', executing make we
need to skip man creation if DOCBOOK_TO_MAN is 'no'.

thanks for answer

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-helpsuse.com

build failure without docbook-utils
user name
2006-07-13 18:12:57

Yes, you are right. DOCBOOK_TO_MAN can be invalid. So we
have to check it before using it. I've applied your patch.

Thanks!
Chris

--
TaskJuggler Developer

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-helpsuse.com

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )