Proposed changes to list.hash and hash.list vmethods

Sergey Martynoff wrote:

>>but I think it's for the best in the long run.
>>
>>Any objections?
> 
> 
> I think the only right way is "never change the
behavior", which
> was discussed here many times. For me, such a changes
to 'list'
> and 'hash' vmethods will be all right, and even wanted.
But Josh
> writes the right thing - it may break some code, so
this solution
> is unacceptable.

How about leaving the current vmethods and creating 2 new
ones, eg: 
tolist and tohash?

ROSCO

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
templatestemplate-toolkit.org
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/t
emplates