Hi,
I also think that Xerces-J is a very good open-source
processor;
some people say it's over-engineered; but I liked it this
way, and used it as a reference for many scenarios.
MS .NET should also be good nowadays - and fast; if you are
on Linux, then try Mono's implementation (although I don't
know
what is the state here). Another one would be Saxon; also
very fine,
and getting better, since one can assume that Mr. Kay wants
his
XSLT 2.0 processor work nicely (but the XML Schema part is
commercial).
If you need to aggregate schemata with Libxml2, then
use the xsd:include and/or xsd:import mechanism.
Aggregation via the API is not supported in Libxml2.
Regards,
Kasimier
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-bounces gnome.org [mailto ml-bo
unces gnome.org] On
> Behalf Of John.Hockaday ga.gov.au
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:01 AM
> To: a.w.p.vaassen xs4all.nl; xml gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [xml] xmllint schema validation
>
> Hi Ad,
>
> The Xerces-J tool by Apache is very, very good. It is
> considered one of the
> best implementations of the W3C XML Schema
specification.
>
> I use Oxygen as a GUI that uses Xerces-J.
>
> I hope that this helps.
>
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-bounces gnome.org [mailto ml-bo
unces gnome.org] On
> Behalf Of
> a.w.p.vaassen
> Sent: Friday, 25 August 2006 5:55 AM
> To: xml gnome.org
> Subject: [xml] xmllint schema validation
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to verify a XML file versus multiple
schemas ?
>
> What would be the prefered tool ?
>
> At this moment I am using xmllint but I believe this
can only
> check against
> one schema, please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Kind regards, Ad
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome.org
> http://mai
l.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
>
>
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml gnome.org
http://mai
l.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
|