It is a nice feature. Are there any performance data
available for the
improvements based on streaming XPath, like throughput,
latency, etc?
As to the XSD validation, does it support full streaming
based
validation? For example, full support for validation in SAX
mode without
the need to keep tree.
Thanks,
Stanley
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:41 PM
To: Stanley Poon (spoon)
Cc: xml gnome.org
Subject: Re: [xml] Streaming XPath Support
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:01:45AM -0800, Stanley Poon
(spoon) wrote:
> My understanding is that the current support is mainly
for the
> Selector in XSD.
right though we also use it to speed-up simple XPath
queries
> Are there any plan to enhance the support for streaming
Xpath such as
> //, *, simple predicates, etc.
I take patches! Again that's something which Kasimier
worked on and a
bit orphaned at this point.
> Also, is this internal feature added
> mainly for performance and for reducing memory usage?
to be able to stream XSD validation without keeping trees
around.
> Is the current implementation based on some finite
state machine
> approach with some path sharing?
based on automatas, see pattern.c in the sources.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/v
irtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ |
Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml gnome.org
http://mai
l.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
|