libthr status

gnnfreebsd.org wrote:
> At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:18:15 +0800,
> David Xu wrote:
>> [1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (7bit)>]
>> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:23, gnnfreebsd.org wrote:
>>>> I will hack at kernel side, but who will
hack userland utilities ?
>>>> e.g the /usr/bin/limits program.
>>> How hard is that to do?  If it's
"easy" then I can sign up to do that.
>>>
>> I think it is not hard, but I think one at least
has to hack
>> /usr/bin/limits, sh and csh which are in our base
system.
> 
> I will take on the task when you have the kernel side
in place.
> 
>> I will update them and make them reviewed.
>>
> 
> Great!
> 
> Thanks,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-threadsfreebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threa
ds
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-threads-unsubscribefreebsd.org"


in a manner of speaking, I wonder if that the thread limit
should
be just related to the process limit..

i.e. N threads count to be 1 process..

if you use linuxthreads of rfork() then you are limited
to the process limit.. why should the other threads be
different?

just a thought.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-threadsfreebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threa
ds
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-threads-unsubscribefreebsd.org"